NUnit 3.0 TestCase const 自定义对象参数
NUnit 3.0 TestCase const custom object arguments
我已经编写了 class SomeObject
并且我想在我的 TestCase
中将此对象的 const
实例定义为 keep/reuse。我应该如何重写下面的代码来实现这种行为?
[TestFixture]
public class SomeObjectTests
{
private const SomeObject item0 = new SomeObject(0.0); // doesn't work
[TestCase(item0, ExpectedResult = 0.0)]
public double TestSomeObjectValue(SomeObject so)
{
return so.Value;
}
[TestCase(item0, ExpectedResult = "0.0")]
public string TestSomeObjectValueString(SomeObject so)
{
return so.ValueString;
}
}
我收到以下错误消息:
A const field of a reference type other than string can only be initialized with null.
C# language spec, §10.3 说(强调我的):
When a symbolic name for a constant value is desired, but when the type of that value is not permitted in a constant declaration, or when the value cannot be computed at compile-time by a constant-expression, a readonly
field (Section 10.4.2) may be used instead.
恼人的是,属性也有一定的限制这一事实使情况更加复杂 - 请参阅 C# language spec, §17.2(再次强调我的):
An expression E is an attribute-argument-expression if all of the following statements are true:
The type of E is an attribute parameter type (Section 17.1.3).
At compile-time, the value of E can be resolved to one of the following:
A constant value.
A System.Type object.
A one-dimensional array of attribute-argument-expressions.
其中§17.1.3:“属性参数类型”说1:
The types of positional and named parameters for an attribute class are limited to the attribute parameter types, which are:
- One of the following types:
bool
, byte
, char
, double
, float
, int
, long
, short
, string
.
- The type
object
.
- The type
System.Type
.
- An enum type, provided it has public accessibility and the types in which it is nested (if any) also have public accessibility (§17.2).
- Single-dimensional arrays of the above types.
1:引用的文本来自旧版本的 C# 规范 - 在 C# 5.0 版本中,提到了另外四种类型:sbyte
, uint
, ulong
, 和 ushort
.
换句话说,你能做的最好的事情是:
[TestFixture]
public class SomeObjectTests {
private static readonly SomeObject item0 = new SomeObject(0.0);
private static SomeObject getObject(string key) {
if ( key == "item0" )
return item0;
throw new ArgumentException("Unknown key");
}
[TestCase("item0", ExpectedResult = 0.0)]
public double TestSomeObjectValue(string key) {
SomeObject so = getObject(key);
return so.Value;
}
[TestCase("item0", ExpectedResult = "0.0")]
public string TestSomeObjectValueString(string key) {
SomeObject so = getObject(key);
return so.ValueString;
}
}
这样,属性的参数是编译时常量,getObject
方法可以处理获取 SomeObject
实例。
- 只需删除常量。它将是每个实例的私有变量
- 将其设为静态,它将成为 class 的单例。
- 将常量替换为只读。这会将其标记为不应该被弄乱的东西。
一个更好的方法来实现你想要做的是使用 TestCaseSource。你的情况:
[TestFixture]
public class SomeObjectTests
{
[TestCaseSource(typeof(TestSomeObject),"TestCasesValue")]
public double TestSomeObjectValue(SomeObject so)
{
return so.Value;
}
[TestCaseSource(typeof(TestSomeObject),"TestCasesValueString")]
public string TestSomeObjectValueString(SomeObject so)
{
return so.ValueString;
}
}
public class TestSomeObject
{
public static IEnumerable TestCasesValue
{
get
{
yield return new TestCaseData( new SomeObject(0.0) ).Returns( 0.0 );
yield return new TestCaseData( new SomeObject(1.0) ).Returns( 1.0 );
}
}
public static IEnumerable TestCasesValueString
{
get
{
yield return new TestCaseData( new SomeObject(0.0) ).Returns( "0.0" );
yield return new TestCaseData( new SomeObject(1.0) ).Returns( "1.0" );
}
}
}
我已经编写了 class SomeObject
并且我想在我的 TestCase
中将此对象的 const
实例定义为 keep/reuse。我应该如何重写下面的代码来实现这种行为?
[TestFixture]
public class SomeObjectTests
{
private const SomeObject item0 = new SomeObject(0.0); // doesn't work
[TestCase(item0, ExpectedResult = 0.0)]
public double TestSomeObjectValue(SomeObject so)
{
return so.Value;
}
[TestCase(item0, ExpectedResult = "0.0")]
public string TestSomeObjectValueString(SomeObject so)
{
return so.ValueString;
}
}
我收到以下错误消息:
A const field of a reference type other than string can only be initialized with null.
C# language spec, §10.3 说(强调我的):
When a symbolic name for a constant value is desired, but when the type of that value is not permitted in a constant declaration, or when the value cannot be computed at compile-time by a constant-expression, a
readonly
field (Section 10.4.2) may be used instead.
恼人的是,属性也有一定的限制这一事实使情况更加复杂 - 请参阅 C# language spec, §17.2(再次强调我的):
An expression E is an attribute-argument-expression if all of the following statements are true:
The type of E is an attribute parameter type (Section 17.1.3).
At compile-time, the value of E can be resolved to one of the following:
A constant value.
A System.Type object.
A one-dimensional array of attribute-argument-expressions.
其中§17.1.3:“属性参数类型”说1:
The types of positional and named parameters for an attribute class are limited to the attribute parameter types, which are:
- One of the following types:
bool
,byte
,char
,double
,float
,int
,long
,short
,string
.- The type
object
.- The type
System.Type
.- An enum type, provided it has public accessibility and the types in which it is nested (if any) also have public accessibility (§17.2).
- Single-dimensional arrays of the above types.
1:引用的文本来自旧版本的 C# 规范 - 在 C# 5.0 版本中,提到了另外四种类型:sbyte
, uint
, ulong
, 和 ushort
.
换句话说,你能做的最好的事情是:
[TestFixture]
public class SomeObjectTests {
private static readonly SomeObject item0 = new SomeObject(0.0);
private static SomeObject getObject(string key) {
if ( key == "item0" )
return item0;
throw new ArgumentException("Unknown key");
}
[TestCase("item0", ExpectedResult = 0.0)]
public double TestSomeObjectValue(string key) {
SomeObject so = getObject(key);
return so.Value;
}
[TestCase("item0", ExpectedResult = "0.0")]
public string TestSomeObjectValueString(string key) {
SomeObject so = getObject(key);
return so.ValueString;
}
}
这样,属性的参数是编译时常量,getObject
方法可以处理获取 SomeObject
实例。
- 只需删除常量。它将是每个实例的私有变量
- 将其设为静态,它将成为 class 的单例。
- 将常量替换为只读。这会将其标记为不应该被弄乱的东西。
一个更好的方法来实现你想要做的是使用 TestCaseSource。你的情况:
[TestFixture]
public class SomeObjectTests
{
[TestCaseSource(typeof(TestSomeObject),"TestCasesValue")]
public double TestSomeObjectValue(SomeObject so)
{
return so.Value;
}
[TestCaseSource(typeof(TestSomeObject),"TestCasesValueString")]
public string TestSomeObjectValueString(SomeObject so)
{
return so.ValueString;
}
}
public class TestSomeObject
{
public static IEnumerable TestCasesValue
{
get
{
yield return new TestCaseData( new SomeObject(0.0) ).Returns( 0.0 );
yield return new TestCaseData( new SomeObject(1.0) ).Returns( 1.0 );
}
}
public static IEnumerable TestCasesValueString
{
get
{
yield return new TestCaseData( new SomeObject(0.0) ).Returns( "0.0" );
yield return new TestCaseData( new SomeObject(1.0) ).Returns( "1.0" );
}
}
}