使用适配器设计模式

Using Adapter Design Pattern

我正致力于实施适配器设计模式以利用现有的 classes。我的问题是,classes 的工作原理几乎相同,但名称不同且功能较少。

例如,每个 Work class 和 Homework class 都有一个功能相同,这是 doWork()doHomework().
我可以 link 这些到 doThis()Task 界面。但是,Work class 没有 done() 函数,而 Homework class 有它。我将如何处理这个问题?只是没有实施?有没有更好的方法?

class Task {
public:
  virtual int doThis() = 0;
  virtual bool done() = 0;
};

class Work {
public:
  Work();
  int doWork();
};

class Homework {
public:
  Homework();
  int doHomework();
  bool done();
  bool isDone;
};

class WorkAdapter : public Task, private Work {
public:
  WorkAdapter();
  int doThis() {
    return doWork();
  }
  virtual bool done() {
    // Is this okay not to implment this?
  }
};

class HomeworkAdapter : public Task, private Homework {
public:
  HomeworkAdapter();
  int doThis() {
    return doWork();
  }
  virtual bool done() {
    return isDone;
  }
};

int main() {

  Task *homework = new HomeworkAdapter();
  Task *work = new WorkAdapter();

  homework->doThis();
  bool isHomeworkDone = homework->done();

  work->doThis();
  bool isWorkDone = work->done();  // This would never be called in my implementation...
}

使用多重继承的 adapter 实现(public 用于目标,私有用于适配器)是一种有效的方法。

只需注意函数的 return 类型:

class HomeworkAdapter : public Task, private Homework {
public:
  HomeworkAdapter() {}
  int doThis() override {  // make sure you override target member
    return doWork();       // and return value as expected
  }
  bool done() override {
    return isDone;
  }
};

提示:不需要在派生的 class 中指定虚拟。相反,值得使用覆盖,只是为了避免在参数不匹配或 return 类型的情况下出现细微问题。

当被适配者没有可用于照顾done()的功能时,您必须模仿它。所以这不仅仅是更改名称,还要确保类似的行为:

class WorkAdapter : public Task, private Work {
  bool isdone;       // functionality to add
public:
  WorkAdapter() : isdone(false) {}
  int doThis() override {
    auto rc = doWork();
    isdone = true;    // once it's done, it's done ;-)
    return rc; 
  }
  bool done() override {
    return isdone;      // you must add this 
  }
};