Mac OS X for printf a double 上的 Valgrind 错误
Valgrind Errors on Mac OS X for printf a double
目前正在跟牛逼learncodethehardway series学C。
我遇到了以下情况:
我编译了以下代码,一切看起来都很好:
#include <stdio.h>
int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
int bugs = 100;
double bug_rate = 1.2;
printf("You have %d bugs a the imaginary rate of %f!\n", bugs, bug_rate);
return 0;
}
它也能正常工作。
当我 运行 现在使用 Valgrind (3.11.0; should be updated for OS X El Capitan) 时,我收到以下消息:
==18896== Memcheck, a memory error detector
==18896== Copyright (C) 2002-2015, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al.
==18896== Using Valgrind-3.11.0 and LibVEX; rerun with -h for copyright info
==18896== Command: ./ex7
==18896==
You have 100 bugs a the imaginary rate of 1.200000!
==18896==
==18896== HEAP SUMMARY:
==18896== in use at exit: 26,081 bytes in 188 blocks
==18896== total heap usage: 272 allocs, 84 frees, 32,321 bytes allocated
==18896==
==18896== 148 (80 direct, 68 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 42 of 65
==18896== at 0x100007EA1: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:303)
==18896== by 0x1001C58D6: __Balloc_D2A (in /usr/lib/system/libsystem_c.dylib)
==18896== by 0x1001C621F: __d2b_D2A (in /usr/lib/system/libsystem_c.dylib)
==18896== by 0x1001C2877: __dtoa (in /usr/lib/system/libsystem_c.dylib)
==18896== by 0x1001EB3E6: __vfprintf (in /usr/lib/system/libsystem_c.dylib)
==18896== by 0x1002146C8: __v2printf (in /usr/lib/system/libsystem_c.dylib)
==18896== by 0x1001EA389: vfprintf_l (in /usr/lib/system/libsystem_c.dylib)
==18896== by 0x1001E8223: printf (in /usr/lib/system/libsystem_c.dylib)
==18896== by 0x100000F32: main (ex7.c:10)
==18896==
==18896== 2,064 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 59 of 65
==18896== at 0x10000821C: malloc_zone_malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:305)
==18896== by 0x1004F6EFD: _objc_copyClassNamesForImage (in /usr/lib/libobjc.A.dylib)
==18896== by 0x1004EA182: protocols() (in /usr/lib/libobjc.A.dylib)
==18896== by 0x1004EA093: readClass(objc_class*, bool, bool) (in /usr/lib/libobjc.A.dylib)
==18896== by 0x1004E7C13: gc_init (in /usr/lib/libobjc.A.dylib)
==18896== by 0x1004EF24E: objc_initializeClassPair_internal(objc_class*, char const*, objc_class*, objc_class*) (in /usr/lib/libobjc.A.dylib)
==18896== by 0x1004FC132: layout_string_create (in /usr/lib/libobjc.A.dylib)
==18896== by 0x1004EA83C: realizeClass(objc_class*) (in /usr/lib/libobjc.A.dylib)
==18896== by 0x1004EA300: copySwiftV1MangledName(char const*, bool) (in /usr/lib/libobjc.A.dylib)
==18896== by 0x1004EA2E9: copySwiftV1MangledName(char const*, bool) (in /usr/lib/libobjc.A.dylib)
==18896== by 0x1004EA2E9: copySwiftV1MangledName(char const*, bool) (in /usr/lib/libobjc.A.dylib)
==18896== by 0x1004EA2E9: copySwiftV1MangledName(char const*, bool) (in /usr/lib/libobjc.A.dylib)
==18896==
==18896== LEAK SUMMARY:
==18896== definitely lost: 80 bytes in 1 blocks
==18896== indirectly lost: 68 bytes in 2 blocks
==18896== possibly lost: 2,064 bytes in 1 blocks
==18896== still reachable: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==18896== suppressed: 23,869 bytes in 184 blocks
==18896==
==18896== For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v
==18896== ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 2 contexts (suppressed: 18 from 18)
我不明白。我的 line:10 没问题吧?
非常感谢。
不幸的是,printf
使用的库并不总是以理想的方式运行。 Valgrind 会注意到所有错误 - 不仅是您犯的错误,还有在 OSX 上的标准 C 库实现中犯的每个错误。例如。
其中一些 "errors" 可能是真正的错误(这种情况很少见),其他的可能是库开发人员采取的小捷径,这对 Valgrind 来说可能看起来并不完全正确。其中之一是依赖 操作系统 在程序退出时清除和释放所有剩余内存 - 在迂腐的世界中,程序应该在退出前释放所有内存。但是,在 DOS and AmigaOS.
前后的某个地方,这不再是绝对必要的了
我并不是说这一定是您在该错误中看到的内容,而是您需要注意 Valgrind 所说的内容。
要在实践中使用 Valgrind,您可能需要一个抑制文件,它可以删除与系统库相关的错误消息。这是最近的(2015 年 1 月)blog post about this issue,正是因为 "learning C the hard way" 在 OSX.
目前正在跟牛逼learncodethehardway series学C。 我遇到了以下情况:
我编译了以下代码,一切看起来都很好:
#include <stdio.h>
int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
int bugs = 100;
double bug_rate = 1.2;
printf("You have %d bugs a the imaginary rate of %f!\n", bugs, bug_rate);
return 0;
}
它也能正常工作。
当我 运行 现在使用 Valgrind (3.11.0; should be updated for OS X El Capitan) 时,我收到以下消息:
==18896== Memcheck, a memory error detector
==18896== Copyright (C) 2002-2015, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al.
==18896== Using Valgrind-3.11.0 and LibVEX; rerun with -h for copyright info
==18896== Command: ./ex7
==18896==
You have 100 bugs a the imaginary rate of 1.200000!
==18896==
==18896== HEAP SUMMARY:
==18896== in use at exit: 26,081 bytes in 188 blocks
==18896== total heap usage: 272 allocs, 84 frees, 32,321 bytes allocated
==18896==
==18896== 148 (80 direct, 68 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 42 of 65
==18896== at 0x100007EA1: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:303)
==18896== by 0x1001C58D6: __Balloc_D2A (in /usr/lib/system/libsystem_c.dylib)
==18896== by 0x1001C621F: __d2b_D2A (in /usr/lib/system/libsystem_c.dylib)
==18896== by 0x1001C2877: __dtoa (in /usr/lib/system/libsystem_c.dylib)
==18896== by 0x1001EB3E6: __vfprintf (in /usr/lib/system/libsystem_c.dylib)
==18896== by 0x1002146C8: __v2printf (in /usr/lib/system/libsystem_c.dylib)
==18896== by 0x1001EA389: vfprintf_l (in /usr/lib/system/libsystem_c.dylib)
==18896== by 0x1001E8223: printf (in /usr/lib/system/libsystem_c.dylib)
==18896== by 0x100000F32: main (ex7.c:10)
==18896==
==18896== 2,064 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 59 of 65
==18896== at 0x10000821C: malloc_zone_malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:305)
==18896== by 0x1004F6EFD: _objc_copyClassNamesForImage (in /usr/lib/libobjc.A.dylib)
==18896== by 0x1004EA182: protocols() (in /usr/lib/libobjc.A.dylib)
==18896== by 0x1004EA093: readClass(objc_class*, bool, bool) (in /usr/lib/libobjc.A.dylib)
==18896== by 0x1004E7C13: gc_init (in /usr/lib/libobjc.A.dylib)
==18896== by 0x1004EF24E: objc_initializeClassPair_internal(objc_class*, char const*, objc_class*, objc_class*) (in /usr/lib/libobjc.A.dylib)
==18896== by 0x1004FC132: layout_string_create (in /usr/lib/libobjc.A.dylib)
==18896== by 0x1004EA83C: realizeClass(objc_class*) (in /usr/lib/libobjc.A.dylib)
==18896== by 0x1004EA300: copySwiftV1MangledName(char const*, bool) (in /usr/lib/libobjc.A.dylib)
==18896== by 0x1004EA2E9: copySwiftV1MangledName(char const*, bool) (in /usr/lib/libobjc.A.dylib)
==18896== by 0x1004EA2E9: copySwiftV1MangledName(char const*, bool) (in /usr/lib/libobjc.A.dylib)
==18896== by 0x1004EA2E9: copySwiftV1MangledName(char const*, bool) (in /usr/lib/libobjc.A.dylib)
==18896==
==18896== LEAK SUMMARY:
==18896== definitely lost: 80 bytes in 1 blocks
==18896== indirectly lost: 68 bytes in 2 blocks
==18896== possibly lost: 2,064 bytes in 1 blocks
==18896== still reachable: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==18896== suppressed: 23,869 bytes in 184 blocks
==18896==
==18896== For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v
==18896== ERROR SUMMARY: 2 errors from 2 contexts (suppressed: 18 from 18)
我不明白。我的 line:10 没问题吧?
非常感谢。
不幸的是,printf
使用的库并不总是以理想的方式运行。 Valgrind 会注意到所有错误 - 不仅是您犯的错误,还有在 OSX 上的标准 C 库实现中犯的每个错误。例如。
其中一些 "errors" 可能是真正的错误(这种情况很少见),其他的可能是库开发人员采取的小捷径,这对 Valgrind 来说可能看起来并不完全正确。其中之一是依赖 操作系统 在程序退出时清除和释放所有剩余内存 - 在迂腐的世界中,程序应该在退出前释放所有内存。但是,在 DOS and AmigaOS.
前后的某个地方,这不再是绝对必要的了我并不是说这一定是您在该错误中看到的内容,而是您需要注意 Valgrind 所说的内容。
要在实践中使用 Valgrind,您可能需要一个抑制文件,它可以删除与系统库相关的错误消息。这是最近的(2015 年 1 月)blog post about this issue,正是因为 "learning C the hard way" 在 OSX.