Skienna DFS 算法
Skienna DFS algorithm
以下是Skiena'a算法设计手册中提供的DFS代码。
bool processed[MAXV+1]; /* which vertices have been processed */
bool discovered[MAXV+1]; /* which vertices have been found */
int parent[MAXV+1]; /* discovery relation */
#define MAXV 1000 /* maximum number of vertices */
typedef struct {
int y; /* adjacency info */
int weight; /* edge weight, if any */
struct edgenode *next; /* next edge in list */
} edgenode;
typedef struct {
edgenode *edges[MAXV+1]; /* adjacency info */
int degree[MAXV+1]; /* outdegree of each vertex */
int nvertices; /* number of vertices in graph */
int nedges; /* number of edges in graph */
bool directed; /* is the graph directed? */
} graph;
dfs(graph *g, int v)
{
edgenode *p; /* temporary pointer */
int y; /* successor vertex */
if (finished) return; /* allow for search termination */
discovered[v] = TRUE;
time = time + 1;
entry_time[v] = time;
process_vertex_early(v);
p = g->edges[v];
while (p != NULL) {
y = p->y;
if (discovered[y] == FALSE)
{
parent[y] = v;
process_edge(v,y);
dfs(g,y);
}
else if ((!processed[y] && (parent[v]!=y) ) || (g->directed))
process_edge(v,y);
if (finished) return;
p = p->next;
}
process_vertex_late(v);
time = time + 1;
exit_time[v] = time;
processed[v] = TRUE;
}
我觉得检查:
else if ((!processed[y] && (parent[v]!=y) ) || (g->directed))
process_edge(v,y);
可以简单地是:
else if ((parent[v]!=y ) || (g->directed))
process_edge(v,y);
我看不出 processed[y]
怎么可能在代码的这一点上成为 true
。在无向图上的 DFS 中,标记为已处理的节点已经 运行 通过它的所有后代,所以事实上,在代码中的那个点,我们通过尚未处理的边到达 y
节点,使得 y
不可能已经被处理。如果 Skiena 代码是正确的,并且 processed[y]
检查的正确性是必要的,那么我在这里缺少什么?您能否举一个需要该条件的示例 - 我无法想象?
有必要。让图成为三个顶点的无向循环。
dfs可以按以下顺序进行:1 -> 2 -> 3。当我们回到1
时(处理完2
和3
),有3
的边缘,但 3
已被处理,因此需要进行检查。
以下是Skiena'a算法设计手册中提供的DFS代码。
bool processed[MAXV+1]; /* which vertices have been processed */
bool discovered[MAXV+1]; /* which vertices have been found */
int parent[MAXV+1]; /* discovery relation */
#define MAXV 1000 /* maximum number of vertices */
typedef struct {
int y; /* adjacency info */
int weight; /* edge weight, if any */
struct edgenode *next; /* next edge in list */
} edgenode;
typedef struct {
edgenode *edges[MAXV+1]; /* adjacency info */
int degree[MAXV+1]; /* outdegree of each vertex */
int nvertices; /* number of vertices in graph */
int nedges; /* number of edges in graph */
bool directed; /* is the graph directed? */
} graph;
dfs(graph *g, int v)
{
edgenode *p; /* temporary pointer */
int y; /* successor vertex */
if (finished) return; /* allow for search termination */
discovered[v] = TRUE;
time = time + 1;
entry_time[v] = time;
process_vertex_early(v);
p = g->edges[v];
while (p != NULL) {
y = p->y;
if (discovered[y] == FALSE)
{
parent[y] = v;
process_edge(v,y);
dfs(g,y);
}
else if ((!processed[y] && (parent[v]!=y) ) || (g->directed))
process_edge(v,y);
if (finished) return;
p = p->next;
}
process_vertex_late(v);
time = time + 1;
exit_time[v] = time;
processed[v] = TRUE;
}
我觉得检查:
else if ((!processed[y] && (parent[v]!=y) ) || (g->directed))
process_edge(v,y);
可以简单地是:
else if ((parent[v]!=y ) || (g->directed))
process_edge(v,y);
我看不出 processed[y]
怎么可能在代码的这一点上成为 true
。在无向图上的 DFS 中,标记为已处理的节点已经 运行 通过它的所有后代,所以事实上,在代码中的那个点,我们通过尚未处理的边到达 y
节点,使得 y
不可能已经被处理。如果 Skiena 代码是正确的,并且 processed[y]
检查的正确性是必要的,那么我在这里缺少什么?您能否举一个需要该条件的示例 - 我无法想象?
有必要。让图成为三个顶点的无向循环。
dfs可以按以下顺序进行:1 -> 2 -> 3。当我们回到1
时(处理完2
和3
),有3
的边缘,但 3
已被处理,因此需要进行检查。