使用 mockito 和 spy 进行单元测试导致错误

Unit testing with mockito and spy causing error

我正在使用 Mockito 和 Spy 对函数进行单元测试。

这是正在测试的class:

public class RecipeListModelImp
        implements RecipeListModelContract {

    private Subscription subscription;
    private RecipesAPI recipesAPI;

    @Inject
    public RecipeListModelImp(@NonNull RecipesAPI recipesAPI) {
        this.recipesAPI = Preconditions.checkNotNull(recipesAPI);
    }

    @Override
    public void getRecipesFromAPI(final RecipeGetAllListener recipeGetAllListener) {
        subscription = recipesAPI.getAllRecipes()
               .subscribeOn(Schedulers.io())
                .observeOn(AndroidSchedulers.mainThread())
                .subscribe(new Subscriber<List<Recipe>>() {
                    @Override
                    public void onCompleted() {
                              }
                    @Override

                    public void onError(Throwable e) {
                                  recipeGetAllListener.onRecipeGetAllFailure(e.getMessage());

                    }


                    @Override

                    public void onNext(List<Recipe> recipe) {                       recipeGetAllListener.onRecipeGetAllSuccess(recipe);
                    }
                });
    }

    @Override
    public void shutdown() {
        if(subscription != null && !subscription.isUnsubscribed()) {
            subscription.unsubscribe();
        }
    }
}

我正在尝试使用 Mockito 和间谍进行测试,因为我不想调用真正的函数 recipesAPI.getAllRecipes() 只是验证 it.The 测试被调用 testGetRecipesFromAPI()

public class RecipeListModelImpTest {
    @Mock Subscription subscription;
    @Mock RecipesAPI recipesAPI;
    @Mock RecipeListModelContract.RecipeGetAllListener recipeGetAllListener;

    private RecipeListModelContract recipeListModel;

    @Before
    public void setup() {
        MockitoAnnotations.initMocks(RecipeListModelImpTest.this);
        recipeListModel = new RecipeListModelImp(recipesAPI);
    }

    @Test
    public void testGetRecipesFromAPI() {
        RecipeListModelContract recipeListModelSpy = spy(recipeListModel);
        RecipesAPI recipeApiSpy = spy(recipesAPI);
        doNothing().when(recipeApiSpy).getAllRecipes();

        recipeListModelSpy.getRecipesFromAPI(recipeGetAllListener);

        verify(recipesAPI, times(1)).getAllRecipes();

    }

    @Test
    public void testShouldShutdown() {
        recipeListModel.shutdown();
        verify(subscription, times(1)).unsubscribe();
    }
}

这是错误:

org.mockito.exceptions.base.MockitoException: 
Only void methods can doNothing()!
Example of correct use of doNothing():
    doNothing().
    doThrow(new RuntimeException())
    .when(mock).someVoidMethod();
Above means:
someVoidMethod() does nothing the 1st time but throws an exception the 2nd time is called

我也试过这个会导致空指针:

  @Test
    public void testGetRecipesFromAPI() {
        RecipeListModelContract recipeListModelSpy = spy(recipeListModel);
        RecipesAPI recipeApiSpy = spy(recipesAPI);

        doReturn(Observable.just(Subscription.class)).when(recipeApiSpy).getAllRecipes();

        recipeListModelSpy.getRecipesFromAPI(recipeGetAllListener);

        verify(recipesAPI, times(1)).getAllRecipes();
    }

如你所写

subscription = recipesAPI.getAllRecipes().subscribeOn(Schedulers.io())

然后方法 getAllRecipes() returns 一些对象,你不能使用

doNothing().when(recipeApiSpy).getAllRecipes();

doNothing() - 用于方法 returns void.

变体是正确的:

doReturn(doReturn(Observable.just(Subscription.class)).when(recipeApiSpy).getAllRecipes()

您正在混合使用 Spy(部分模拟)和 Mocks(完整模拟)。这是不必要的 - Spy 允许您混合模拟和真实方法调用,但您不需要任何部分模拟。在您的情况下,您要么完全嘲笑,要么不嘲笑。 Mockito 的 documentation 有更多关于模拟和间谍的信息。

在您的第一个示例中,错误是您正在尝试 doNothing 一个 return 的方法。 Mockito 不允许这样做。你在第二个例子中所做的几乎是正确的。

对于您的第二个示例,问题是您将 getAllRecipes() 设置为 return 和 Observable.just(Subscription.class),但您仍然在被测单元中调用了整个方法链:subscribeOnobserveOnsubscribe。您还需要模拟这些调用以及对 return 您可以使用的模拟对象或那些抛出 NullPointerException 的调用。

@Test
public void testGetRecipesFromAPI() { 
    //recipesAPI.getAllRecipes() needs to be mocked to return something (likely a mock)
    // so subscribeOn can be called.
    //That needs to be mocked to return something so observeOn can be called
    //etc.

    recipeListModel.getRecipesFromAPI(recipeGetAllListener);

    verify(recipesAPI, times(1)).getAllRecipes();
}

代码中的问题是这部分:subscribeOn(Schedulers.io())。如果我们能消除这个,那么我们就可以从 recipesAPI 返回一个测试数据并测试这个数据是否被 recipeGetAllListener 正确处理了。

因此,我们必须以某种方式创建接缝:如果这是生产代码 - 然后使用 Schedulers.io()/AndroidSchedulers.mainThread(),如果这是测试代码 - 然后使用一些特定的调度程序。

让我们声明一个接口,它将提供 Schedulers:


    interface SchedulersProvider {
        Scheduler getWorkerScheduler();
        Scheduler getUiScheduler();
    }

现在让 RecipeListModelImp 依赖于 SchedulersProvider:


    public class RecipeListModelImp implements RecipeListModelContract {

        ...
        private SchedulersProvider schedulersProvider;

        @Inject
        public RecipeListModelImp(@NonNull RecipesAPI recipesAPI, 
                                  @NonNull SchedulersProvider schedulerProvider) {
            ...
            this.schedulersProvider = schedulersProvider;
        }

        ...
    }

现在,我们将替换调度程序:


    @Override
    public void getRecipesFromAPI(final RecipeGetAllListener recipeGetAllListener) {
        subscription = recipesAPI.getAllRecipes()
                                 .subscribeOn(schedulersProvider.getWorkerScheduler())
                                 .observeOn(schedulersProvider.getUiScheduler())
                                 ...
    }

是时候提供 SchedulerProvider:


    @Module
    public class MyModule {
        ...
        @Provides public SchedulerProvider provideSchedulerProvider() {
            return new SchedulerProvider() {
                @Override
                Scheduler getWorkerScheduler() {
                    return Schedulers.io();
                }

                @Override
                Scheduler getUiScheduler() {
                    return AndroidSchedulers.mainThread();
                }
            }
        }
    }

现在让我们创建另一个模块 - TestModule,它将为测试 classes 提供依赖项。 TestModule 将扩展 MyModule 并覆盖提供 SchedulerProvider:

的方法

    public class TestModule extends MyModule {
        @Override public SchedulerProvider provideSchedulerProvider() {
            return new SchedulerProvider() {
                @Override
                Scheduler getScheduler() {
                    return Schedulers.trampoline();
                }

                @Override
                Scheduler getUiScheduler() {
                    return Schedulers.trampoline();
                }
            }
        }
    }

Schedulers.trampoline() 将在当前线程上执行任务。

是时候创建测试组件了:


    @Component(modules = MyModule.class)
    public interface TestComponent extends MyComponent {
        void inject(RecipeListModelImpTest test);
    }

正在测试中class:


    public class RecipeListModelImpTest {

        @Mock RecipesAPI recipesAPI;
        @Mock RecipeListModelContract.RecipeGetAllListener recipeGetAllListener;

        @Inject SchedulerProvider schedulerProvider;

        private RecipeListModelContract recipeListModel;

        @Before
        public void setup() {
            TestComponent component = DaggerTestComponent.builder()
                                                         .myModule(new TestModule())
                                                         .build();
            component.inject(this);

            MockitoAnnotations.initMocks(this);
            recipeListModel = new RecipeListModelImp(recipesAPI, schedulerProvider);
        }
        ...
    }

以及实际测试部分:

    private static final List<Recipe> TEST_RECIPES = new ArrayList<Recipe>() {
        {
            add(new Recipe(1)),
            add(new Recipe(2))
        }
    };

    @Test
    public void testGetRecipesFromAPI() {
        when(recipeAPI.getAllRecipes())
            .thenReturn(Observable.fromIterable(TEST_RECIPES));

        recipeListModel.getRecipesFromAPI(recipeGetAllListener);

        // verifying, that `recipeAPI.getAllRecipes()` has been called once
        verify(recipeAPI).getAllRecipes();

        // verifying, that we received correct result
        verify(recipeGetAllListener).onRecipeGetAllSuccess(TEST_RECIPES);
    }