Angular 2+ 使用 RxJS - 完成与退订关于 take(1) 和 first()

Angular 2+ using RxJS - complete vs unsubscribe regarding take(1) and first()

通读了一些文档和问题,我发现使用 first() 或 take(1) 时有点不清楚天气实际上在完成时退订。我想我的困惑是围绕 'complete' 与 'unsubscribe'。说一个 observable 完成,这是否也意味着订阅被取消订阅?我正在考虑这个用于垃圾收集,而我需要知道可观察对象在 first() 或 take(1) 完成后不保留任何引用。

如果这些功能不取消订阅,我需要知道最简单的完成后取消订阅的方法。或者这甚至是必要的?

源代码中的一些内容,

(do) first() and take(1) actually unsubscribe when they complete

看起来是这样。

take.ts

protected _next(value: T): void {
  const total = this.total;
  const count = ++this.count;
  if (count <= total) {
    this.destination.next(value);
    if (count === total) {
      this.destination.complete();
      this.unsubscribe();
    }
  }
}

To say an observable completes, does that also mean the subscriptions are unsubscribed?

Subscription.ts 中遇到了这个(在文档中没有看到)

/**
 * Adds a tear down to be called during the unsubscribe() of this
 * Subscription.
 *
   ...
 */
add(teardown: TeardownLogic): Subscription {

所以我认为拆解可以用来验证是否调用了取消订阅。

const source1 = Observable.range(1, 10).take(6)

const subscription1 = source1.subscribe(x => console.log('subscription1'))
  .add(() => console.log('teardown1'))
// Emits 6x then 'teardown1'

const subscription2 = source1.take(4).subscribe(x => console.log('subscription2'))
  .add(() => console.log('teardown2'))
// Emits 4x then 'teardown2'

但请注意,take() 只会取消订阅其自身的下游,而不是 所有 订阅者取消订阅 observable

const source2 = Observable.range(1, 10)

const subscription3 = source2.subscribe(x => console.log('subscription3'))
  .add(() => console.log('teardown3'))
// Emits 10x then 'teardown3'

const subscription4 = source2.take(5).subscribe(x => console.log('subscription4'))
  .add(() => console.log('teardown4'))
// Emits 5x then 'teardown4'

I need to know that the observable isn't retaining any references after first() or take(1) complete.

这有点棘手,这里是Observable.subscribe()方法。似乎观察者没有保留对其三个参数中任何一个的引用,而是订阅保留了对可观察对象的引用。

subscribe(observerOrNext?: PartialObserver<T> | ((value: T) => void),
          error?: (error: any) => void,
          complete?: () => void): Subscription {

  const { operator } = this;
  const sink = toSubscriber(observerOrNext, error, complete);

  if (operator) {
    operator.call(sink, this.source);
  } else {
    sink.add(this.source ? this._subscribe(sink) : this._trySubscribe(sink));
  }

  if (sink.syncErrorThrowable) {
    sink.syncErrorThrowable = false;
    if (sink.syncErrorThrown) {
      throw sink.syncErrorValue;
    }
  }
  return sink;
}

这可以在下面的测试代码中看到。当订阅处于活动状态(关闭:false)时,订阅者具有 _subscriptions

中引用的可观察对象
const source3 = Observable.interval(1000)
const subscription5 = source3.subscribe(x => {})
console.log(source3)
console.log(subscription5)

控制台输出:

IntervalObservable 
  period: 1000
  scheduler: AsyncScheduler {...}
  _isScalar: false
  __proto__: Observable

Subscriber 
  closed: false
  destination: SafeSubscriber {...}
  isStopped: false
  syncErrorThrowable: false
  syncErrorThrown: false
  syncErrorValue: null
  _parent: null
  _parents: null
  _subscriptions: [AsyncAction]
  __proto__: Subscription

但是当我们用 take(1)

关闭订阅时
const source3 = Observable.interval(1000).take(1)
const subscription5 = source3.subscribe(x => {})
console.log(source3)
console.log(subscription5)

订户_subscriptions设置为空,释放引用。

Subscriber 
  closed: true
  destination: SafeSubscriber {...}
  isStopped: true
  syncErrorThrowable: false
  syncErrorThrown: false
  syncErrorValue: null
  _parent: null
  _parents: null
  _subscriptions: null
  __proto__: Subscription

我不确定这是否可以被视为所有 observable/operator/subscriber 链的最终证明,但至少表明了一种验证您的特定用例的方法。