如何从 JUnit 测试中 运行 JMH?
How to run JMH from inside JUnit tests?
如何使用 JUnit 测试 运行 在现有项目中进行 JMH 基准测试?官方文档推荐做一个单独的项目,使用Maven shade插件,并在main
方法中启动JMH。这是必要的吗?为什么推荐这样做?
我一直在使用 JUnit 运行在我现有的 Maven 项目中使用 JMH,没有明显的不良影响。我无法回答为什么作者建议以不同的方式做事。我没有观察到结果的差异。 JMH 为 运行 基准启动了一个单独的 JVM 来隔离它们。这是我的工作:
将 JMH 依赖项添加到您的 POM:
<dependency>
<groupId>org.openjdk.jmh</groupId>
<artifactId>jmh-core</artifactId>
<version>1.21</version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.openjdk.jmh</groupId>
<artifactId>jmh-generator-annprocess</artifactId>
<version>1.21</version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
请注意,我已将它们放在 test
范围内。
在 Eclipse 中,您可能需要手动配置注释处理器。 NetBeans 会自动处理此问题。
创建您的 JUnit 和 JMH class。我选择将两者合并为一个 class,但这取决于您。请注意,OptionsBuilder.include
实际上决定了 JUnit 测试中哪些基准将 运行!
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.Random;
import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit;
import org.junit.Test;
import org.openjdk.jmh.annotations.*;
import org.openjdk.jmh.infra.Blackhole;
import org.openjdk.jmh.runner.Runner;
import org.openjdk.jmh.runner.options.*;
public class TestBenchmark
{
@Test public void
launchBenchmark() throws Exception {
Options opt = new OptionsBuilder()
// Specify which benchmarks to run.
// You can be more specific if you'd like to run only one benchmark per test.
.include(this.getClass().getName() + ".*")
// Set the following options as needed
.mode (Mode.AverageTime)
.timeUnit(TimeUnit.MICROSECONDS)
.warmupTime(TimeValue.seconds(1))
.warmupIterations(2)
.measurementTime(TimeValue.seconds(1))
.measurementIterations(2)
.threads(2)
.forks(1)
.shouldFailOnError(true)
.shouldDoGC(true)
//.jvmArgs("-XX:+UnlockDiagnosticVMOptions", "-XX:+PrintInlining")
//.addProfiler(WinPerfAsmProfiler.class)
.build();
new Runner(opt).run();
}
// The JMH samples are the best documentation for how to use it
// http://hg.openjdk.java.net/code-tools/jmh/file/tip/jmh-samples/src/main/java/org/openjdk/jmh/samples/
@State (Scope.Thread)
public static class BenchmarkState
{
List<Integer> list;
@Setup (Level.Trial) public void
initialize() {
Random rand = new Random();
list = new ArrayList<>();
for (int i = 0; i < 1000; i++)
list.add (rand.nextInt());
}
}
@Benchmark public void
benchmark1 (BenchmarkState state, Blackhole bh) {
List<Integer> list = state.list;
for (int i = 0; i < 1000; i++)
bh.consume (list.get (i));
}
}
JMH 的注释处理器似乎不能很好地与 NetBeans 中的保存时编译一起使用。每当您修改基准时,您可能需要执行完整的 Clean and Build
。 (任何建议表示赞赏!)
运行 你的 launchBenchmark
测试并观察结果!
-------------------------------------------------------
T E S T S
-------------------------------------------------------
Running com.Foo
# JMH version: 1.21
# VM version: JDK 1.8.0_172, Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM, 25.172-b11
# VM invoker: /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-jdk/jre/bin/java
# VM options: <none>
# Warmup: 2 iterations, 1 s each
# Measurement: 2 iterations, 1 s each
# Timeout: 10 min per iteration
# Threads: 2 threads, will synchronize iterations
# Benchmark mode: Average time, time/op
# Benchmark: com.Foo.benchmark1
# Run progress: 0.00% complete, ETA 00:00:04
# Fork: 1 of 1
# Warmup Iteration 1: 4.258 us/op
# Warmup Iteration 2: 4.359 us/op
Iteration 1: 4.121 us/op
Iteration 2: 4.029 us/op
Result "benchmark1":
4.075 us/op
# Run complete. Total time: 00:00:06
REMEMBER: The numbers below are just data. To gain reusable insights, you need to follow up on
why the numbers are the way they are. Use profilers (see -prof, -lprof), design factorial
experiments, perform baseline and negative tests that provide experimental control, make sure
the benchmarking environment is safe on JVM/OS/HW level, ask for reviews from the domain experts.
Do not assume the numbers tell you what you want them to tell.
Benchmark Mode Cnt Score Error Units
Foo.benchmark1 avgt 2 4.075 us/op
Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 7.013 sec
Runner.run
甚至 returns RunResult
您可以对其进行断言等的对象
使用注解的声明式方法:
@State(Scope.Benchmark)
@Threads(1)
public class TestBenchmark {
@Param({"10","100","1000"})
public int iterations;
@Setup(Level.Invocation)
public void setupInvokation() throws Exception {
// executed before each invocation of the benchmark
}
@Setup(Level.Iteration)
public void setupIteration() throws Exception {
// executed before each invocation of the iteration
}
@Benchmark
@BenchmarkMode(Mode.AverageTime)
@Fork(warmups = 1, value = 1)
@Warmup(batchSize = -1, iterations = 3, time = 10, timeUnit = TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS)
@Measurement(batchSize = -1, iterations = 10, time = 10, timeUnit = TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS)
@OutputTimeUnit(TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS)
public void test() throws Exception {
Thread.sleep(ThreadLocalRandom.current().nextInt(0, iterations));
}
@Test
public void benchmark() throws Exception {
String[] argv = {};
org.openjdk.jmh.Main.main(argv);
}
}
@State(Scope.Benchmark)
@Threads(1)
@Fork(1)
@OutputTimeUnit(TimeUnit.MICROSECONDS)
@Warmup(iterations = 5, time = 1)
@Measurement(iterations = 5, time = 1)
@BenchmarkMode(Mode.All)
public class ToBytesTest {
public static void main(String[] args) {
ToBytesTest test = new ToBytesTest();
System.out.println(test.string()[0] == test.charBufferWrap()[0] && test.charBufferWrap()[0] == test.charBufferAllocate()[0]);
}
@Test
public void benchmark() throws Exception {
org.openjdk.jmh.Main.main(new String[]{ToBytesTest.class.getName()});
}
char[] chars = new char[]{'中', '国'};
@Benchmark
public byte[] string() {
return new String(chars).getBytes(StandardCharsets.UTF_8);
}
@Benchmark
public byte[] charBufferWrap() {
return StandardCharsets.UTF_8.encode(CharBuffer.wrap(chars)).array();
}
@Benchmark
public byte[] charBufferAllocate() {
CharBuffer cb = CharBuffer.allocate(chars.length).put(chars);
cb.flip();
return StandardCharsets.UTF_8.encode(cb).array();
}
}
如何使用 JUnit 测试 运行 在现有项目中进行 JMH 基准测试?官方文档推荐做一个单独的项目,使用Maven shade插件,并在main
方法中启动JMH。这是必要的吗?为什么推荐这样做?
我一直在使用 JUnit 运行在我现有的 Maven 项目中使用 JMH,没有明显的不良影响。我无法回答为什么作者建议以不同的方式做事。我没有观察到结果的差异。 JMH 为 运行 基准启动了一个单独的 JVM 来隔离它们。这是我的工作:
将 JMH 依赖项添加到您的 POM:
<dependency> <groupId>org.openjdk.jmh</groupId> <artifactId>jmh-core</artifactId> <version>1.21</version> <scope>test</scope> </dependency> <dependency> <groupId>org.openjdk.jmh</groupId> <artifactId>jmh-generator-annprocess</artifactId> <version>1.21</version> <scope>test</scope> </dependency>
请注意,我已将它们放在
test
范围内。在 Eclipse 中,您可能需要手动配置注释处理器。 NetBeans 会自动处理此问题。
创建您的 JUnit 和 JMH class。我选择将两者合并为一个 class,但这取决于您。请注意,
OptionsBuilder.include
实际上决定了 JUnit 测试中哪些基准将 运行!import java.util.ArrayList; import java.util.List; import java.util.Random; import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit; import org.junit.Test; import org.openjdk.jmh.annotations.*; import org.openjdk.jmh.infra.Blackhole; import org.openjdk.jmh.runner.Runner; import org.openjdk.jmh.runner.options.*; public class TestBenchmark { @Test public void launchBenchmark() throws Exception { Options opt = new OptionsBuilder() // Specify which benchmarks to run. // You can be more specific if you'd like to run only one benchmark per test. .include(this.getClass().getName() + ".*") // Set the following options as needed .mode (Mode.AverageTime) .timeUnit(TimeUnit.MICROSECONDS) .warmupTime(TimeValue.seconds(1)) .warmupIterations(2) .measurementTime(TimeValue.seconds(1)) .measurementIterations(2) .threads(2) .forks(1) .shouldFailOnError(true) .shouldDoGC(true) //.jvmArgs("-XX:+UnlockDiagnosticVMOptions", "-XX:+PrintInlining") //.addProfiler(WinPerfAsmProfiler.class) .build(); new Runner(opt).run(); } // The JMH samples are the best documentation for how to use it // http://hg.openjdk.java.net/code-tools/jmh/file/tip/jmh-samples/src/main/java/org/openjdk/jmh/samples/ @State (Scope.Thread) public static class BenchmarkState { List<Integer> list; @Setup (Level.Trial) public void initialize() { Random rand = new Random(); list = new ArrayList<>(); for (int i = 0; i < 1000; i++) list.add (rand.nextInt()); } } @Benchmark public void benchmark1 (BenchmarkState state, Blackhole bh) { List<Integer> list = state.list; for (int i = 0; i < 1000; i++) bh.consume (list.get (i)); } }
JMH 的注释处理器似乎不能很好地与 NetBeans 中的保存时编译一起使用。每当您修改基准时,您可能需要执行完整的
Clean and Build
。 (任何建议表示赞赏!)运行 你的
launchBenchmark
测试并观察结果!------------------------------------------------------- T E S T S ------------------------------------------------------- Running com.Foo # JMH version: 1.21 # VM version: JDK 1.8.0_172, Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM, 25.172-b11 # VM invoker: /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-jdk/jre/bin/java # VM options: <none> # Warmup: 2 iterations, 1 s each # Measurement: 2 iterations, 1 s each # Timeout: 10 min per iteration # Threads: 2 threads, will synchronize iterations # Benchmark mode: Average time, time/op # Benchmark: com.Foo.benchmark1 # Run progress: 0.00% complete, ETA 00:00:04 # Fork: 1 of 1 # Warmup Iteration 1: 4.258 us/op # Warmup Iteration 2: 4.359 us/op Iteration 1: 4.121 us/op Iteration 2: 4.029 us/op Result "benchmark1": 4.075 us/op # Run complete. Total time: 00:00:06 REMEMBER: The numbers below are just data. To gain reusable insights, you need to follow up on why the numbers are the way they are. Use profilers (see -prof, -lprof), design factorial experiments, perform baseline and negative tests that provide experimental control, make sure the benchmarking environment is safe on JVM/OS/HW level, ask for reviews from the domain experts. Do not assume the numbers tell you what you want them to tell. Benchmark Mode Cnt Score Error Units Foo.benchmark1 avgt 2 4.075 us/op Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 7.013 sec
Runner.run
甚至 returnsRunResult
您可以对其进行断言等的对象
使用注解的声明式方法:
@State(Scope.Benchmark)
@Threads(1)
public class TestBenchmark {
@Param({"10","100","1000"})
public int iterations;
@Setup(Level.Invocation)
public void setupInvokation() throws Exception {
// executed before each invocation of the benchmark
}
@Setup(Level.Iteration)
public void setupIteration() throws Exception {
// executed before each invocation of the iteration
}
@Benchmark
@BenchmarkMode(Mode.AverageTime)
@Fork(warmups = 1, value = 1)
@Warmup(batchSize = -1, iterations = 3, time = 10, timeUnit = TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS)
@Measurement(batchSize = -1, iterations = 10, time = 10, timeUnit = TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS)
@OutputTimeUnit(TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS)
public void test() throws Exception {
Thread.sleep(ThreadLocalRandom.current().nextInt(0, iterations));
}
@Test
public void benchmark() throws Exception {
String[] argv = {};
org.openjdk.jmh.Main.main(argv);
}
}
@State(Scope.Benchmark)
@Threads(1)
@Fork(1)
@OutputTimeUnit(TimeUnit.MICROSECONDS)
@Warmup(iterations = 5, time = 1)
@Measurement(iterations = 5, time = 1)
@BenchmarkMode(Mode.All)
public class ToBytesTest {
public static void main(String[] args) {
ToBytesTest test = new ToBytesTest();
System.out.println(test.string()[0] == test.charBufferWrap()[0] && test.charBufferWrap()[0] == test.charBufferAllocate()[0]);
}
@Test
public void benchmark() throws Exception {
org.openjdk.jmh.Main.main(new String[]{ToBytesTest.class.getName()});
}
char[] chars = new char[]{'中', '国'};
@Benchmark
public byte[] string() {
return new String(chars).getBytes(StandardCharsets.UTF_8);
}
@Benchmark
public byte[] charBufferWrap() {
return StandardCharsets.UTF_8.encode(CharBuffer.wrap(chars)).array();
}
@Benchmark
public byte[] charBufferAllocate() {
CharBuffer cb = CharBuffer.allocate(chars.length).put(chars);
cb.flip();
return StandardCharsets.UTF_8.encode(cb).array();
}
}