"actual does not contain expected" 使用“!contains deep”时

Question

在空手道中尝试使用 !contains deep 检查一些数组内容时，我遇到了一些意外行为和奇怪的错误消息。我正在尝试验证我的人物对象列表是否包含爱丽丝的对象，但不包含查理的对象：

* def people = [ {"name": "Alice", "phone": 123}, {"name": "Bob", "phone": 456} ]
* def alice = { "name": "Alice" }
* def charlie = { "name": "Charlie" }

# assert Alice is present and Charlie is not

# all of these work
* match people contains deep alice
* match people == '#(^+alice)'
* match people != '#(^+charlie)'
* match each people[*] !contains charlie

# but this doesn't
* match people !contains deep charlie

最后一次检查失败：

match failed: CONTAINS_DEEP
  $ | actual does not contain expected | actual array does not contain expected item - {"name":"Charlie"} (LIST:MAP)
  [{"name":"Alice","phone":123},{"name":"Bob","phone":456}]
  {"name":"Charlie"}

    $[1] | actual does not contain expected | all key-values did not match, expected has un-matched keys - [name] (MAP:MAP)
    {"name":"Bob","phone":456}
    {"name":"Charlie"}

      $[1].name | not equal (STRING:STRING)
      'Bob'
      'Charlie'

        $[0] | actual does not contain expected | all key-values did not match, expected has un-matched keys - [name] (MAP:MAP)
        {"name":"Alice","phone":123}
        {"name":"Charlie"}

          $[0].name | not equal (STRING:STRING)
          'Alice'
          'Charlie'

这看起来像我对 contains 的期望，所以 ! 似乎在这里被忽略了？这是一个错误，还是将 contains deep 和 !contains 结合得太乐观了（我注意到文档仅单独提及它们）？

（第二种情况，是否可以简单地否定整个match？）

Answer 1

这会让你得到你想要的：

* match each people !contains charlie

因此，如果对数组进行操作，建议首选 match each。

是的，我不认为 !contains deep 已实现 - 我只想说，非常欢迎您贡献代码来修复此问题或错误消息 - 或提供文档以告知用户此限制.

"actual does not contain expected" 使用“!contains deep”时

"actual does not contain expected" when using "!contains deep"

karate