重复调用 AddHttpClient 是否会相互覆盖?
Do repeated calls to AddHttpClient overwrite each other?
我有一个 NuGet 包,里面有这样的代码:
services.AddHttpClient("CompanyStandardClient").AddCompanyAuthenticationHeaders();
还有另一个 Nuget 项目,其中包含这样的代码:
services.AddHttpClient("CompanyStandardClient").AddCompanyHeaderPropagation();
基本上,一个 NuGet 设置我公司的身份验证,另一个设置公司的 header 传播。
我通常会这样做:
services.AddHttpClient("CompanyStandardClient").AddCompanyAuthenticationHeaders().AddCompanyHeaderPropagation()
我担心分开做的话只有一个有效。我查看了 code on GitHub,它 returns 为每个调用 new
ed DefaultHttpClientBuilder。
return new DefaultHttpClientBuilder(services, name);
但是我不确定这是否意味着之前的条目被覆盖了。
是否可以单独“添加”同名客户端?还是会覆盖?
根据此处的内部评论,我认为可以为同名客户端完成此操作。
// See comments on HttpClientMappingRegistry.
private static void ReserveClient(IHttpClientBuilder builder, Type type, string name, bool validateSingleType)
{
var registry = (HttpClientMappingRegistry)builder.Services.Single(sd => sd.ServiceType == typeof(HttpClientMappingRegistry)).ImplementationInstance;
Debug.Assert(registry != null);
// Check for same name registered to two types. This won't work because we rely on named options for the configuration.
if (registry.NamedClientRegistrations.TryGetValue(name, out Type otherType) &&
// Allow using the same name with multiple types in some cases (see callers).
validateSingleType &&
// Allow registering the same name twice to the same type.
type != otherType)
{
string message =
$"The HttpClient factory already has a registered client with the name '{name}', bound to the type '{otherType.FullName}'. " +
$"Client names are computed based on the type name without considering the namespace ('{otherType.Name}'). " +
$"Use an overload of AddHttpClient that accepts a string and provide a unique name to resolve the conflict.";
throw new InvalidOperationException(message);
}
if (validateSingleType)
{
registry.NamedClientRegistrations[name] = type;
}
}
客户端选项配置将聚合为一个选项。
我有一个 NuGet 包,里面有这样的代码:
services.AddHttpClient("CompanyStandardClient").AddCompanyAuthenticationHeaders();
还有另一个 Nuget 项目,其中包含这样的代码:
services.AddHttpClient("CompanyStandardClient").AddCompanyHeaderPropagation();
基本上,一个 NuGet 设置我公司的身份验证,另一个设置公司的 header 传播。
我通常会这样做:
services.AddHttpClient("CompanyStandardClient").AddCompanyAuthenticationHeaders().AddCompanyHeaderPropagation()
我担心分开做的话只有一个有效。我查看了 code on GitHub,它 returns 为每个调用 new
ed DefaultHttpClientBuilder。
return new DefaultHttpClientBuilder(services, name);
但是我不确定这是否意味着之前的条目被覆盖了。
是否可以单独“添加”同名客户端?还是会覆盖?
根据此处的内部评论,我认为可以为同名客户端完成此操作。
// See comments on HttpClientMappingRegistry.
private static void ReserveClient(IHttpClientBuilder builder, Type type, string name, bool validateSingleType)
{
var registry = (HttpClientMappingRegistry)builder.Services.Single(sd => sd.ServiceType == typeof(HttpClientMappingRegistry)).ImplementationInstance;
Debug.Assert(registry != null);
// Check for same name registered to two types. This won't work because we rely on named options for the configuration.
if (registry.NamedClientRegistrations.TryGetValue(name, out Type otherType) &&
// Allow using the same name with multiple types in some cases (see callers).
validateSingleType &&
// Allow registering the same name twice to the same type.
type != otherType)
{
string message =
$"The HttpClient factory already has a registered client with the name '{name}', bound to the type '{otherType.FullName}'. " +
$"Client names are computed based on the type name without considering the namespace ('{otherType.Name}'). " +
$"Use an overload of AddHttpClient that accepts a string and provide a unique name to resolve the conflict.";
throw new InvalidOperationException(message);
}
if (validateSingleType)
{
registry.NamedClientRegistrations[name] = type;
}
}
客户端选项配置将聚合为一个选项。