如何高效修改list of list的所有元素,并添加到现有的list list中

How to efficiently modify all elements of a list of lists and add them to the existing list of lists

假设我有一个如下所示的列表:

myList = [[1.,1.,6.],[2.,4.,4.],[3.,3.,3.]]

现在我想对 myList 中的每个列表应用某个函数,为了简单起见,它看起来像这样(它只是将列表的每个元素除以该列表的总和)。

def changeVal(l):
    return map(lambda x: x/sum(l),l)

将它应用到 myList 得到:

modList = map(lambda x: changeVal(x), myList)
[[0.125, 0.125, 0.75],
[0.2, 0.4, 0.4],
[0.3333333333333333, 0.3333333333333333, 0.3333333333333333]]

但我真正想要的是将modList的所有元素添加到myList。我可以在 for 循环中执行此操作:

for sl in modList:
    myList.append(sl)

这给了我想要的输出:

[[1.0, 1.0, 6.0],
 [2.0, 4.0, 4.0],
 [3.0, 3.0, 3.0],
 [0.125, 0.125, 0.75],
 [0.2, 0.4, 0.4],
 [0.3333333333333333, 0.3333333333333333, 0.3333333333333333]]

但是,我想在不使用 for 循环的情况下执行此操作,因为 append 很慢。我试过了:

myList.append(*modList)
myList.extend(*modList)

这两个都给我一个 TypeError:

TypeError: extend() takes exactly one argument (3 given)

这里又是代码和期望的输出:

myList = [[1.,1.,6.],[2.,4.,4.],[3.,3.,3.]]
def changeVal(l):
    return map(lambda x: x/sum(l),l)
modList = map(lambda x: changeVal(x), myList)

如何将 modList 的元素添加到 myList 以获得以下输出?

[[1.0, 1.0, 6.0],
 [2.0, 4.0, 4.0],
 [3.0, 3.0, 3.0],
 [0.125, 0.125, 0.75],
 [0.2, 0.4, 0.4],
 [0.3333333333333333, 0.3333333333333333, 0.3333333333333333]]

此处使用的正确函数是 extend() ,但 extend 接受您要扩展的列表,而不是该列表的元素。尝试类似 -

myList.extend(modList)

例子-

>>> l = [[1,2],[3,4]]
>>> l1 = [[5,6],[7,8]]
>>> l.extend(l1)
>>>
>>> l
[[1, 2], [3, 4], [5, 6], [7, 8]]

虽然如果 modList 没有在其他任何地方使用,您可以完全避免创建中间列表,方法是 -

myList.extend(map(lambda x: changeVal(x), myList))

两种方法的时间结果 -

In [42]: def func1():
   ....:     l = [[1,2],[3,4]]
   ....:     l1 = [[5,6],[7,8]]
   ....:     for i in l1:
   ....:         l.append(i)
   ....:     return l
   ....:

In [43]: def func2():
   ....:     l = [[1,2],[3,4]]
   ....:     l1 = [[5,6],[7,8]]
   ....:     l.extend(l1)
   ....:     return l
   ....:

In [44]:

In [44]: %timeit func1()
The slowest run took 8.35 times longer than the fastest. This could mean that an intermediate result is being cached
1000000 loops, best of 3: 1 µs per loop

In [45]: %timeit func2()
The slowest run took 9.11 times longer than the fastest. This could mean that an intermediate result is being cached
1000000 loops, best of 3: 794 ns per loop

In [47]: %timeit func1()
The slowest run took 7.74 times longer than the fastest. This could mean that an intermediate result is being cached
1000000 loops, best of 3: 983 ns per loop

In [46]: %timeit func2()
1000000 loops, best of 3: 799 ns per loop

所以使用 .extend()for 循环和 .append() 快一点。