For 循环导致 Task.Run 或 Task.Start 溢出
For Loop result in Overflow with Task.Run or Task.Start
遇到问题,希望有人能帮我解决。
我尝试在循环中启动 4 个任务,但我收到 ArgumentOutOfRangeException:
for (int i = 0; i < 4; i++)
{
//start task with current connection
tasks[i] = Task<byte[]>.Run(() => GetData(i, plcPool[i]));
}
循环溢出,因为 i = 4
如果我在没有循环的情况下启动任务,它们 运行 没有任何问题:
tasks[0] = Task<byte[]>.Run(() => GetData(0, plcPool[0]));
tasks[1] = Task<byte[]>.Run(() => GetData(1, plcPool[1]));
tasks[2] = Task<byte[]>.Run(() => GetData(2, plcPool[2]));
tasks[3] = Task<byte[]>.Run(() => GetData(3, plcPool[3]));
不知道为什么?任务 通过套接字连接从西门子 PLC 获取数据。 PLC 最多支持 32 个连接。每个连接我收到 200 字节。
private byte[] GetData(int id, PLC plc)
{
switch (id)
{
case 0:
return plc.ReadBytes(DataType.DataBlock, 50, 0, 200);
case 1:
return plc.ReadBytes(DataType.DataBlock, 50, 200, 200);
case 2:
return plc.ReadBytes(DataType.DataBlock, 50, 500, 200);
case 3:
return plc.ReadBytes(DataType.DataBlock, 50, 700, 200);
case 4:
return plc.ReadBytes(DataType.DataBlock, 50, 900, 117);
default:
return null;
}
}
有什么想法吗?
问候山姆
可能是closure problem造成的。
试试这个:
for (int i = 0; i < 4; i++)
{
//start task with current connection
int index = i;
tasks[index] = Task<byte[]>.Run(() => GetData(index, plcPool[index]));
}
可能发生的情况是,当最后一个线程开始 运行 时,循环已经将 i
增加到 4,这就是传递给 GetData()
的值。将 i
的值捕获到一个单独的变量 index
中并使用它应该可以解决该问题。
举个例子,如果你试试这个代码:
public static void Main()
{
Console.WriteLine("Starting.");
for (int i = 0; i < 4; ++i)
Task.Run(() => Console.WriteLine(i));
Console.WriteLine("Finished. Press <ENTER> to exit.");
Console.ReadLine();
}
它经常会给你这样的输出:
Starting.
Finished. Press <ENTER> to exit.
4
4
4
4
将该代码更改为:
public static void Main()
{
Console.WriteLine("Starting.");
for (int i = 0; i < 4; ++i)
{
int j = i;
Task.Run(() => Console.WriteLine(j));
}
Console.WriteLine("Finished. Press <ENTER> to exit.");
Console.ReadLine();
}
你会得到类似
的东西
Starting.
Finished. Press <ENTER> to exit.
0
1
3
2
请注意它仍然没有必要按顺序排列!您将看到打印出所有正确的值,但顺序不确定。多线程很棘手!
In C# 5, the loop variable of a foreach will be logically inside the loop, and therefore closures will close over a fresh copy of the variable each time. The "for" loop will not be changed.
另一种方式是:
- 创建任务
- 运行 任务。
- 等待所有任务完成。
演示代码如下:
internal class Program
{
private static void Main(string[] args)
{
Task[] tasks = new Task[4];
for (int i = 0; i < 4; i++)
{
//start task with current connection
tasks[i] = new Task<byte[]>(GetData,i);
}
foreach (var task in tasks)
{
task.Start();
}
Task.WaitAll(tasks);
Console.Read();
}
private static byte[] GetData(object index)
{
var i = (int) index;
switch (i)
{
case 0:
//return plc.ReadBytes(DataType.DataBlock, 50, 0, 200);
Console.WriteLine(i);
return new byte[] { };
case 1:
//return plc.ReadBytes(DataType.DataBlock, 50, 200, 200);
case 2:
Console.WriteLine(i);
return new byte[] { };
//return plc.ReadBytes(DataType.DataBlock, 50, 500, 200);
case 3:
Console.WriteLine(i);
return new byte[] { };
//return plc.ReadBytes(DataType.DataBlock, 50, 700, 200);
case 4:
//return plc.ReadBytes(DataType.DataBlock, 50, 900, 117);
Console.WriteLine(i);
return new byte[] { };
default:
return null;
}
}
}
输出:
3
1
0
2
注意:是 new Task<byte[]>(GetData,i);
不是 new Task<byte[]>(()=>GetData(i));
()=>v means "return the current value of variable v", not "return the value v was back when the delegate was created". Closures close over variables, not over values.
所以new Task<byte[]>(GetData,i);
没有“闭包问题”
2021 年,您真的应该为此使用内置的 Parallel.For
。要达到你想要的效果非常简单:
ConcurrentBag<byte[]> results = new ConcurrentBag<byte[]>();
ParallelLoopResult result = Parallel.For(0, 4, (i, state) => {
results.Add(GetData(i, plcPool[i]));
});
遇到问题,希望有人能帮我解决。
我尝试在循环中启动 4 个任务,但我收到 ArgumentOutOfRangeException:
for (int i = 0; i < 4; i++)
{
//start task with current connection
tasks[i] = Task<byte[]>.Run(() => GetData(i, plcPool[i]));
}
循环溢出,因为 i = 4
如果我在没有循环的情况下启动任务,它们 运行 没有任何问题:
tasks[0] = Task<byte[]>.Run(() => GetData(0, plcPool[0]));
tasks[1] = Task<byte[]>.Run(() => GetData(1, plcPool[1]));
tasks[2] = Task<byte[]>.Run(() => GetData(2, plcPool[2]));
tasks[3] = Task<byte[]>.Run(() => GetData(3, plcPool[3]));
不知道为什么?任务 通过套接字连接从西门子 PLC 获取数据。 PLC 最多支持 32 个连接。每个连接我收到 200 字节。
private byte[] GetData(int id, PLC plc)
{
switch (id)
{
case 0:
return plc.ReadBytes(DataType.DataBlock, 50, 0, 200);
case 1:
return plc.ReadBytes(DataType.DataBlock, 50, 200, 200);
case 2:
return plc.ReadBytes(DataType.DataBlock, 50, 500, 200);
case 3:
return plc.ReadBytes(DataType.DataBlock, 50, 700, 200);
case 4:
return plc.ReadBytes(DataType.DataBlock, 50, 900, 117);
default:
return null;
}
}
有什么想法吗?
问候山姆
可能是closure problem造成的。
试试这个:
for (int i = 0; i < 4; i++)
{
//start task with current connection
int index = i;
tasks[index] = Task<byte[]>.Run(() => GetData(index, plcPool[index]));
}
可能发生的情况是,当最后一个线程开始 运行 时,循环已经将 i
增加到 4,这就是传递给 GetData()
的值。将 i
的值捕获到一个单独的变量 index
中并使用它应该可以解决该问题。
举个例子,如果你试试这个代码:
public static void Main()
{
Console.WriteLine("Starting.");
for (int i = 0; i < 4; ++i)
Task.Run(() => Console.WriteLine(i));
Console.WriteLine("Finished. Press <ENTER> to exit.");
Console.ReadLine();
}
它经常会给你这样的输出:
Starting.
Finished. Press <ENTER> to exit.
4
4
4
4
将该代码更改为:
public static void Main()
{
Console.WriteLine("Starting.");
for (int i = 0; i < 4; ++i)
{
int j = i;
Task.Run(() => Console.WriteLine(j));
}
Console.WriteLine("Finished. Press <ENTER> to exit.");
Console.ReadLine();
}
你会得到类似
的东西Starting.
Finished. Press <ENTER> to exit.
0
1
3
2
请注意它仍然没有必要按顺序排列!您将看到打印出所有正确的值,但顺序不确定。多线程很棘手!
In C# 5, the loop variable of a foreach will be logically inside the loop, and therefore closures will close over a fresh copy of the variable each time. The "for" loop will not be changed.
另一种方式是:
- 创建任务
- 运行 任务。
- 等待所有任务完成。
演示代码如下:
internal class Program
{
private static void Main(string[] args)
{
Task[] tasks = new Task[4];
for (int i = 0; i < 4; i++)
{
//start task with current connection
tasks[i] = new Task<byte[]>(GetData,i);
}
foreach (var task in tasks)
{
task.Start();
}
Task.WaitAll(tasks);
Console.Read();
}
private static byte[] GetData(object index)
{
var i = (int) index;
switch (i)
{
case 0:
//return plc.ReadBytes(DataType.DataBlock, 50, 0, 200);
Console.WriteLine(i);
return new byte[] { };
case 1:
//return plc.ReadBytes(DataType.DataBlock, 50, 200, 200);
case 2:
Console.WriteLine(i);
return new byte[] { };
//return plc.ReadBytes(DataType.DataBlock, 50, 500, 200);
case 3:
Console.WriteLine(i);
return new byte[] { };
//return plc.ReadBytes(DataType.DataBlock, 50, 700, 200);
case 4:
//return plc.ReadBytes(DataType.DataBlock, 50, 900, 117);
Console.WriteLine(i);
return new byte[] { };
default:
return null;
}
}
}
输出:
3 1 0 2
注意:是 new Task<byte[]>(GetData,i);
不是 new Task<byte[]>(()=>GetData(i));
()=>v means "return the current value of variable v", not "return the value v was back when the delegate was created". Closures close over variables, not over values.
所以new Task<byte[]>(GetData,i);
没有“闭包问题”
2021 年,您真的应该为此使用内置的 Parallel.For
。要达到你想要的效果非常简单:
ConcurrentBag<byte[]> results = new ConcurrentBag<byte[]>();
ParallelLoopResult result = Parallel.For(0, 4, (i, state) => {
results.Add(GetData(i, plcPool[i]));
});