Django 查询 child 条记录而不获取重复行

Django query on child records without getting duplicate rows

我正在尝试编写一个 Django 查询来查找一组 parent 记录以及某些类型的 child 记录。问题是 parent 记录有两个 children 匹配搜索结果将包含两次。

我怎样才能得到每个 parent 一次,即使它有多个匹配 child?

我在下面提供了一个简单示例来演示该问题。 Blog 是 parent,Entry 是 child。当我搜索包含标题中带有 "Hello" 的条目的博客时,我得到了 Jimmy 博客的两个副本。

这是我创建的记录和我尝试的查询:

    b = Blog(name="Jimmy's Jottings")
    b.save()
    Entry(blog=b, headline='Hello, World!').save()
    Entry(blog=b, headline='Hello Kitty').save()

    blog_count = Blog.objects.filter(entries__headline__contains='Hello').count()
    assert blog_count == 1, blog_count

您可以看到只有一个博客,但是断言失败,计数为两个。

完整示例如下:

# Tested with Django 1.9.2
import sys

import django
from django.apps import apps
from django.apps.config import AppConfig
from django.conf import settings
from django.db import connections, models, DEFAULT_DB_ALIAS
from django.db.models.base import ModelBase

NAME = 'udjango'


def main():
    setup()

    class Blog(models.Model):
        name = models.CharField(max_length=100)
        tagline = models.TextField()

        def __str__(self):              # __unicode__ on Python 2
            return self.name

    class Entry(models.Model):
        blog = models.ForeignKey(Blog, related_name='entries')
        headline = models.CharField(max_length=255)
        body_text = models.TextField()

        def __str__(self):              # __unicode__ on Python 2
            return self.headline

    syncdb(Blog)
    syncdb(Entry)

    b = Blog(name="Jimmy's Jottings")
    b.save()
    Entry(blog=b, headline='Hello, World!').save()
    Entry(blog=b, headline='Hello Kitty').save()

    blog_count = Blog.objects.filter(entries__headline__contains='Hello').count()
    assert blog_count == 1, blog_count

    print('Done.')


def setup():
    DB_FILE = NAME + '.db'
    with open(DB_FILE, 'w'):
        pass  # wipe the database
    settings.configure(
        DEBUG=True,
        DATABASES={
            DEFAULT_DB_ALIAS: {
                'ENGINE': 'django.db.backends.sqlite3',
                'NAME': DB_FILE}},
        LOGGING={'version': 1,
                 'disable_existing_loggers': False,
                 'formatters': {
                    'debug': {
                        'format': '%(asctime)s[%(levelname)s]'
                                  '%(name)s.%(funcName)s(): %(message)s',
                        'datefmt': '%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S'}},
                 'handlers': {
                    'console': {
                        'level': 'DEBUG',
                        'class': 'logging.StreamHandler',
                        'formatter': 'debug'}},
                 'root': {
                    'handlers': ['console'],
                    'level': 'WARN'},
                 'loggers': {
                    "django.db": {"level": "WARN"}}})
    app_config = AppConfig(NAME, sys.modules['__main__'])
    apps.populate([app_config])
    django.setup()
    original_new_func = ModelBase.__new__

    @staticmethod
    def patched_new(cls, name, bases, attrs):
        if 'Meta' not in attrs:
            class Meta:
                app_label = NAME
            attrs['Meta'] = Meta
        return original_new_func(cls, name, bases, attrs)
    ModelBase.__new__ = patched_new


def syncdb(model):
    """ Standard syncdb expects models to be in reliable locations.

    Based on https://github.com/django/django/blob/1.9.3
    /django/core/management/commands/migrate.py#L285
    """
    connection = connections[DEFAULT_DB_ALIAS]
    with connection.schema_editor() as editor:
        editor.create_model(model)

main()

诀窍是使用子查询查找匹配子项的博客 ID,然后搜索在该子查询中具有 ID 的所有博客。那么子查询可以有重复,而不会导致主查询出现重复。

固定查询如下:

blog_ids = Entry.objects.filter(headline__contains='Hello').values('blog_id')
blog_count = Blog.objects.filter(id__in=blog_ids).count()
assert blog_count == 1, blog_count

这是生成的 SQL 查询:

SELECT  COUNT(*) AS "__count"
FROM    "udjango_blog"
WHERE   "udjango_blog"."id" IN
        (
        SELECT  U0."blog_id"
        FROM    "udjango_entry" U0
        WHERE   U0."headline" LIKE '%Hello%' ESCAPE '\'
        )

虽然我相信 Don Kirby 的回应有效,但我认为更好的解决方案是在查询集的末尾添加 .distinct()。这只是从查询结果中消除了任何重复的行。 SQL 等价于在给定查询上使用 SELECT DISTINCT。