Android Studio 模拟器：Intel Atom x86 与 ARM
Android Studio Emulator: Intel Atom x86 vs ARM
Intel Atom x86 与 ARM 模拟器有何不同？
以及两者之间的优缺点是什么？
Intel-based devices can run the full range of Android apps, even ones
that were originally written for the ARM architecture. However, if an
app contains ARM-specific code, then it must be translated before it
can be executed.
This takes time and energy to do, so battery life and overall
performance may suffer. Whether this is a serious problem is up for
debate: our reviews indicate that Intel does tend to trail behind ARM
in battery life, but the gap isn’t huge, and overall performance is
generally very good.
At any rate, Intel is working hard to encourage developers to produce
Intel-native versions of their apps, so hopefully translation will
become progressively less of an issue.
来源：http://www.alphr.com/features/390064/arm-vs-intel-processors-what-s-the-difference
它说，"Running an x86 base Android Virtual Device is 10x faster"- 在尝试 运行 手臂虚拟设备时。所以我想，x86 更快。
Intel Atom x86 与 ARM 模拟器有何不同？
以及两者之间的优缺点是什么？
Intel-based devices can run the full range of Android apps, even ones that were originally written for the ARM architecture. However, if an app contains ARM-specific code, then it must be translated before it can be executed.
This takes time and energy to do, so battery life and overall performance may suffer. Whether this is a serious problem is up for debate: our reviews indicate that Intel does tend to trail behind ARM in battery life, but the gap isn’t huge, and overall performance is generally very good.
At any rate, Intel is working hard to encourage developers to produce Intel-native versions of their apps, so hopefully translation will become progressively less of an issue.
来源：http://www.alphr.com/features/390064/arm-vs-intel-processors-what-s-the-difference
它说，"Running an x86 base Android Virtual Device is 10x faster"- 在尝试 运行 手臂虚拟设备时。所以我想，x86 更快。