Swift 负数时加倍奇怪
Swift doubly strange when negative
Xcode 8.2.1, Swift 3.
import UIKit
extension Double {
/// Linear interpolation.
/// Converts a number in one range to its equivalent in another range.
func interpolate(from: ClosedRange<Int>, to: ClosedRange<Int>) -> Double {
let oldValue = self
let offset = Double(to.lowerBound - from.lowerBound)
let expansion = Double(to.upperBound - to.lowerBound) / Double(from.upperBound - from.lowerBound)
print("\nvalue", oldValue)
print("Sign", self.sign)
print("offset", offset)
print("expansion", expansion)
print("oldLowerbound", Double(from.lowerBound))
let newValue = (oldValue - Double(from.lowerBound)) * expansion + offset
return newValue
}
}
print( 1.0.interpolate(from: 0...10, to: 50...70)) // Prints 52.0. Correct
print(-1.0.interpolate(from: 0...10, to: 50...70)) // Prints -52.0. Expected 48.0.
print((-1.0).interpolate(from: 0...10, to: 50...70)) // Prints 48. Correct.
当单元测试在最(看似)微不足道的代码中揭示意想不到的问题时,它们会为自己付出代价:
(上面的代码将 运行 在 iOS 操场上。)
有没有办法扩展Double
以使第二个打印语句按预期工作(无需像第三个打印语句那样使用括号)?
这是评估顺序的问题。您的第二个表达式被评估为
-(1.0.interpolate(from: 0...10, to: 50...70)) // -52.0
即interpolate()
在 1.0
上调用,结果取反。
您必须像在第三个表达式中那样设置显式括号,以便在 -1.0
:
上调用 interpolate()
(-1.0).interpolate(from: 0...10, to: 50...70) // 48.0.
Martin R 是正确的,这是评估顺序的问题,遗憾的是(据我所知)中缀运算符(在本例中为 -
)不能指定优先级。我想出的唯一方法是自定义插值运算符
infix operator ~|
func ~|(lhs: Double, rhs: (from: ClosedRange<Int>, to: ClosedRange<Int>)) -> Double {
return lhs.interpolate(from: rhs.from, to: rhs.to)
}
所以结果是:
-1.0 ~| (from: 0...10, to: 50...70) // prints 48
为了防止直接调用双扩展方法插值,可以将其文件私有地封装在同一个文件中。
Xcode 8.2.1, Swift 3.
import UIKit
extension Double {
/// Linear interpolation.
/// Converts a number in one range to its equivalent in another range.
func interpolate(from: ClosedRange<Int>, to: ClosedRange<Int>) -> Double {
let oldValue = self
let offset = Double(to.lowerBound - from.lowerBound)
let expansion = Double(to.upperBound - to.lowerBound) / Double(from.upperBound - from.lowerBound)
print("\nvalue", oldValue)
print("Sign", self.sign)
print("offset", offset)
print("expansion", expansion)
print("oldLowerbound", Double(from.lowerBound))
let newValue = (oldValue - Double(from.lowerBound)) * expansion + offset
return newValue
}
}
print( 1.0.interpolate(from: 0...10, to: 50...70)) // Prints 52.0. Correct
print(-1.0.interpolate(from: 0...10, to: 50...70)) // Prints -52.0. Expected 48.0.
print((-1.0).interpolate(from: 0...10, to: 50...70)) // Prints 48. Correct.
当单元测试在最(看似)微不足道的代码中揭示意想不到的问题时,它们会为自己付出代价:
(上面的代码将 运行 在 iOS 操场上。)
有没有办法扩展Double
以使第二个打印语句按预期工作(无需像第三个打印语句那样使用括号)?
这是评估顺序的问题。您的第二个表达式被评估为
-(1.0.interpolate(from: 0...10, to: 50...70)) // -52.0
即interpolate()
在 1.0
上调用,结果取反。
您必须像在第三个表达式中那样设置显式括号,以便在 -1.0
:
interpolate()
(-1.0).interpolate(from: 0...10, to: 50...70) // 48.0.
Martin R 是正确的,这是评估顺序的问题,遗憾的是(据我所知)中缀运算符(在本例中为 -
)不能指定优先级。我想出的唯一方法是自定义插值运算符
infix operator ~|
func ~|(lhs: Double, rhs: (from: ClosedRange<Int>, to: ClosedRange<Int>)) -> Double {
return lhs.interpolate(from: rhs.from, to: rhs.to)
}
所以结果是:
-1.0 ~| (from: 0...10, to: 50...70) // prints 48
为了防止直接调用双扩展方法插值,可以将其文件私有地封装在同一个文件中。