具有多重继承的复制赋值运算符
Copy assignment operator with multiple inheritance
我下面的复制构造函数工作正常,但我不明白我的复制赋值运算符有什么问题。
#include <iostream>
template <typename... Ts> class foo;
template <typename Last>
class foo<Last> {
Last last;
public:
foo (Last r) : last(r) { }
foo() = default;
foo (const foo& other) : last(other.last) { }
foo& operator= (const foo& other) {
last = other.last;
return *this;
}
};
template <typename First, typename... Rest>
class foo<First, Rest...> : public foo<Rest...> {
First first;
public:
foo (First f, Rest... rest) : foo<Rest...>(rest...), first(f) { }
foo() = default;
foo (const foo& other) : foo<Rest...>(other), first(other.first) { std::cout << "[Copy constructor called]\n"; }
foo& operator= (const foo& other) { // Copy assignment operator
if (&other == this)
return *this;
first = other.first;
return foo<Rest...>::operator= (other);
}
};
int main() {
const foo<int, char, bool> a(4, 'c', true);
foo<int, char, bool> b = a; // Copy constructor works fine.
foo<int, char, bool> c;
// c = a; // Won't compile.
}
错误信息:
error: invalid initialization of reference of type 'foo<int, char, bool>&' from expression of type 'foo<char, bool>'
return foo<Rest...>::operator= (other);
^
有人能指出这里的问题吗?
你的return声明
return foo<Rest...>::operator= (other);
Returns a foo<Rest...>
(这是 operator=
定义的引用类型)。但它是由一个应该 return a foo<First, Rest...>&
.
的操作员执行的
本质上,您 return 一个 Base
,其中需要一个 Derived&
引用。引用根本不会绑定。
幸运的是,修复很简单:不要 return foo<Rest...>::operator=
、return *this
的结果。
foo& operator= (const foo& other) { // Copy assignment operator
if (&other == this)
return *this;
first = other.first;
foo<Rest...>::operator= (other);
return *this;
}
看起来 return 来自 operator=
的派生 class 是不正确的:
return foo<Rest...>::operator= (other);
它 return 的基数 class,而它应该是 *this
。改成
this -> foo<Rest...>::operator= (other);
return *this;
感谢StoryTeller,这是一个优化的完全编译解决方案(operator=委托给另一个命名成员名称copy_data
,不检查自赋值,递归实现):
#include <iostream>
template <typename... Ts> class foo;
template <typename Last>
class foo<Last> {
Last last;
public:
foo (Last r) : last(r) { }
foo() = default;
foo (const foo& other) : last(other.last) { }
foo& operator= (const foo& other) {
if (&other == this)
return *this;
last = other.last;
return *this;
}
protected:
void copy_data (const foo& other) {
last = other.last;
}
};
template <typename First, typename... Rest>
class foo<First, Rest...> : public foo<Rest...> {
First first;
public:
foo (First f, Rest... rest) : foo<Rest...>(rest...), first(f) { }
foo() = default;
foo (const foo& other) : foo<Rest...>(other), first(other.first) { std::cout << "[Copy constructor called]\n"; }
foo& operator= (const foo& other) { // Copy assignment operator
if (&other == this)
return *this;
first = other.first;
// foo<Rest...>::operator= (other);
foo<Rest...>::copy_data(other);
std::cout << "[Assignment operator called]\n";
return *this;
}
protected:
void copy_data (const foo& other) {
first = other.first;
foo<Rest...>::copy_data(other);
}
};
int main() {
const foo<int, char, bool> a(4, 'c', true);
foo<int, char, bool> b = a; // Copy constructor works fine.
foo<int, char, bool> c;
c = b; // Copy assignment operator works fine (and optimized).
}
我下面的复制构造函数工作正常,但我不明白我的复制赋值运算符有什么问题。
#include <iostream>
template <typename... Ts> class foo;
template <typename Last>
class foo<Last> {
Last last;
public:
foo (Last r) : last(r) { }
foo() = default;
foo (const foo& other) : last(other.last) { }
foo& operator= (const foo& other) {
last = other.last;
return *this;
}
};
template <typename First, typename... Rest>
class foo<First, Rest...> : public foo<Rest...> {
First first;
public:
foo (First f, Rest... rest) : foo<Rest...>(rest...), first(f) { }
foo() = default;
foo (const foo& other) : foo<Rest...>(other), first(other.first) { std::cout << "[Copy constructor called]\n"; }
foo& operator= (const foo& other) { // Copy assignment operator
if (&other == this)
return *this;
first = other.first;
return foo<Rest...>::operator= (other);
}
};
int main() {
const foo<int, char, bool> a(4, 'c', true);
foo<int, char, bool> b = a; // Copy constructor works fine.
foo<int, char, bool> c;
// c = a; // Won't compile.
}
错误信息:
error: invalid initialization of reference of type 'foo<int, char, bool>&' from expression of type 'foo<char, bool>'
return foo<Rest...>::operator= (other);
^
有人能指出这里的问题吗?
你的return声明
return foo<Rest...>::operator= (other);
Returns a foo<Rest...>
(这是 operator=
定义的引用类型)。但它是由一个应该 return a foo<First, Rest...>&
.
本质上,您 return 一个 Base
,其中需要一个 Derived&
引用。引用根本不会绑定。
幸运的是,修复很简单:不要 return foo<Rest...>::operator=
、return *this
的结果。
foo& operator= (const foo& other) { // Copy assignment operator
if (&other == this)
return *this;
first = other.first;
foo<Rest...>::operator= (other);
return *this;
}
看起来 return 来自 operator=
的派生 class 是不正确的:
return foo<Rest...>::operator= (other);
它 return 的基数 class,而它应该是 *this
。改成
this -> foo<Rest...>::operator= (other);
return *this;
感谢StoryTeller,这是一个优化的完全编译解决方案(operator=委托给另一个命名成员名称copy_data
,不检查自赋值,递归实现):
#include <iostream>
template <typename... Ts> class foo;
template <typename Last>
class foo<Last> {
Last last;
public:
foo (Last r) : last(r) { }
foo() = default;
foo (const foo& other) : last(other.last) { }
foo& operator= (const foo& other) {
if (&other == this)
return *this;
last = other.last;
return *this;
}
protected:
void copy_data (const foo& other) {
last = other.last;
}
};
template <typename First, typename... Rest>
class foo<First, Rest...> : public foo<Rest...> {
First first;
public:
foo (First f, Rest... rest) : foo<Rest...>(rest...), first(f) { }
foo() = default;
foo (const foo& other) : foo<Rest...>(other), first(other.first) { std::cout << "[Copy constructor called]\n"; }
foo& operator= (const foo& other) { // Copy assignment operator
if (&other == this)
return *this;
first = other.first;
// foo<Rest...>::operator= (other);
foo<Rest...>::copy_data(other);
std::cout << "[Assignment operator called]\n";
return *this;
}
protected:
void copy_data (const foo& other) {
first = other.first;
foo<Rest...>::copy_data(other);
}
};
int main() {
const foo<int, char, bool> a(4, 'c', true);
foo<int, char, bool> b = a; // Copy constructor works fine.
foo<int, char, bool> c;
c = b; // Copy assignment operator works fine (and optimized).
}