Clojure 规范 "conformer" 函数,它是什么?
Clojure spec "conformer" function, what is it?
clojure.spec.alpha
API 有一个名为 conformer
的宏,描述如下:
Usage: (conformer f)
(conformer f unf)
takes a predicate function with the semantics of conform i.e. it should
return either a (possibly converted) value or :clojure.spec.alpha/invalid,
and returns a spec that uses it as a predicate/conformer. Optionally takes
a second fn that does unform of result of first
如果不是深奥的话,我也不清楚。
它有什么用? "unformer"(不应该是 "unconformer")有什么用?我想从返回的 "conformed value"? 中重新创建原始数据。
更新
经过15分钟的实验,似乎是要从"predicate"创建一个新的"spec"("spec"有什么特别的??)
我试过了
(require '[clojure.spec.alpha :as s :refer [valid? explain conform conformer]])
; ---
; Using purely clojure.spec.alpha:
; ---
(s/def ::vtx-x float?)
(s/def ::vtx-y float?)
(s/def ::vertex (s/keys :req [::vtx-x ::vtx-y]))
(type (s/get-spec ::vertex))
;=> clojure.spec.alpha$map_spec_impl$reify__1997
(conform ::vertex { ::vtx-x 1.0 ::vtx-y 2.0 })
;=> #:user{:vtx-x 1.0, :vtx-y 2.0}
(valid? ::vertex { ::vtx-x 1.0 ::vtx-y 2.0 })
;=> true
(conform ::vertex { ::vtx-x 1.0 })
;=> :clojure.spec.alpha/invalid
; ---
; Using my own special sauce predicate function, where the conformed
; value carries additional information ... maybe for a debugging system?
; ---
(defn my-vertex-conformer [v]
(when-let [ { x ::vtx-x y ::vtx-y } v ]
(if (and (float? x) (float? y))
[:comment "Vertex conforms!" :something (+ x y) :orig v]
; else
:clojure.spec.alpha/invalid)))
(defn my-vertex-unformer [conf-v] (get conf-v :orig))
(s/def ::my-vertex (conformer my-vertex-conformer my-vertex-unformer))
(type (s/get-spec ::my-vertex))
;=> clojure.spec.alpha$spec_impl$reify__2059
(conform ::my-vertex { ::vtx-x 1.0 ::vtx-y 2.0 })
;=> [:comment "Vertex conforms!" :something 3.0
;=> :orig #:user{:vtx-x 1.0, :vtx-y 2.0}]
(valid? ::my-vertex { ::vtx-x 1.0 ::vtx-y 2.0 })
;=> true
(conform ::my-vertex { ::vtx-x 1.0 })
;=> :clojure.spec.alpha/invalid
奖金,这里也不例外,这是疏忽吗?
(conformer map?)
;=> #object[clojure.spec.alpha$spec_impl$reify__2059 0x770b843 "clojure.spec.alpha$spec_impl$reify__2059@770b843"]
(type (conformer map?))
;=> clojure.spec.alpha$spec_impl$reify__2059
What is it used for?
用于创建一个规范(当用于符合一个值时)可以 return 一个与给定的值不同的值。
(s/conform str 1)
=> 1 ;; (str 1) returned truthy value; input value unchanged
(s/conform (s/conformer str) 1)
=> "1" ;; returns (str 1)
What is the "unformer" (shouldn't that be an "unconformer") used for? I suppose to recreate the original data from the returned "conformed value"?
确切地说,unformer
函数可用于反转构造者使用 s/unform
所做的任何更改。
(s/def ::str (s/conformer str #(Integer/parseInt %)))
(s/conform ::str 1)
=> "1"
(s/unform ::str "1")
=> 1
有机会简化您的示例规范:
(defn my-vertex-conformer [v]
(let [{x ::vtx-x y ::vtx-y} v] ;; don't need validation here
{:comment "Vertex conforms!" :something (+ x y) :orig v}))
(s/def ::my-vertex
(s/and ::vertex ;; because the validation is done by (s/and ::vertex ...)
(s/conformer my-vertex-conformer
:orig))) ;; keyword can be used as unform function
(->> {::vtx-x 1.0 ::vtx-y 2.0}
(s/conform ::my-vertex)
(s/unform ::my-vertex))
=> {::vtx-x 1.0 ::vtx-y 2.0}
Bonus, amazingly no exception here, is this an oversight?
(conformer map?)
不,这里没有任何问题,尽管使用 map?
和 conformer
:
这样的布尔谓词函数可能不常见
(s/conform (s/conformer map?) {})
=> true
(s/conform (s/conformer map?) [])
=> false
(s/conformer map?)
是一个规范,它可以接受任何值,如果它是一个映射,则符合 true,否则为 false。
where does [spec] come from initially?
合同的概念已经以各种形式出现了一段时间,例如https://docs.racket-lang.org/guide/contracts.html. Also see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Design_by_contract.
clojure.spec.alpha
API 有一个名为 conformer
的宏,描述如下:
Usage: (conformer f) (conformer f unf) takes a predicate function with the semantics of conform i.e. it should return either a (possibly converted) value or :clojure.spec.alpha/invalid, and returns a spec that uses it as a predicate/conformer. Optionally takes a second fn that does unform of result of first
如果不是深奥的话,我也不清楚。
它有什么用? "unformer"(不应该是 "unconformer")有什么用?我想从返回的 "conformed value"? 中重新创建原始数据。
更新
经过15分钟的实验,似乎是要从"predicate"创建一个新的"spec"("spec"有什么特别的??)
我试过了
(require '[clojure.spec.alpha :as s :refer [valid? explain conform conformer]])
; ---
; Using purely clojure.spec.alpha:
; ---
(s/def ::vtx-x float?)
(s/def ::vtx-y float?)
(s/def ::vertex (s/keys :req [::vtx-x ::vtx-y]))
(type (s/get-spec ::vertex))
;=> clojure.spec.alpha$map_spec_impl$reify__1997
(conform ::vertex { ::vtx-x 1.0 ::vtx-y 2.0 })
;=> #:user{:vtx-x 1.0, :vtx-y 2.0}
(valid? ::vertex { ::vtx-x 1.0 ::vtx-y 2.0 })
;=> true
(conform ::vertex { ::vtx-x 1.0 })
;=> :clojure.spec.alpha/invalid
; ---
; Using my own special sauce predicate function, where the conformed
; value carries additional information ... maybe for a debugging system?
; ---
(defn my-vertex-conformer [v]
(when-let [ { x ::vtx-x y ::vtx-y } v ]
(if (and (float? x) (float? y))
[:comment "Vertex conforms!" :something (+ x y) :orig v]
; else
:clojure.spec.alpha/invalid)))
(defn my-vertex-unformer [conf-v] (get conf-v :orig))
(s/def ::my-vertex (conformer my-vertex-conformer my-vertex-unformer))
(type (s/get-spec ::my-vertex))
;=> clojure.spec.alpha$spec_impl$reify__2059
(conform ::my-vertex { ::vtx-x 1.0 ::vtx-y 2.0 })
;=> [:comment "Vertex conforms!" :something 3.0
;=> :orig #:user{:vtx-x 1.0, :vtx-y 2.0}]
(valid? ::my-vertex { ::vtx-x 1.0 ::vtx-y 2.0 })
;=> true
(conform ::my-vertex { ::vtx-x 1.0 })
;=> :clojure.spec.alpha/invalid
奖金,这里也不例外,这是疏忽吗?
(conformer map?)
;=> #object[clojure.spec.alpha$spec_impl$reify__2059 0x770b843 "clojure.spec.alpha$spec_impl$reify__2059@770b843"]
(type (conformer map?))
;=> clojure.spec.alpha$spec_impl$reify__2059
What is it used for?
用于创建一个规范(当用于符合一个值时)可以 return 一个与给定的值不同的值。
(s/conform str 1)
=> 1 ;; (str 1) returned truthy value; input value unchanged
(s/conform (s/conformer str) 1)
=> "1" ;; returns (str 1)
What is the "unformer" (shouldn't that be an "unconformer") used for? I suppose to recreate the original data from the returned "conformed value"?
确切地说,unformer
函数可用于反转构造者使用 s/unform
所做的任何更改。
(s/def ::str (s/conformer str #(Integer/parseInt %)))
(s/conform ::str 1)
=> "1"
(s/unform ::str "1")
=> 1
有机会简化您的示例规范:
(defn my-vertex-conformer [v]
(let [{x ::vtx-x y ::vtx-y} v] ;; don't need validation here
{:comment "Vertex conforms!" :something (+ x y) :orig v}))
(s/def ::my-vertex
(s/and ::vertex ;; because the validation is done by (s/and ::vertex ...)
(s/conformer my-vertex-conformer
:orig))) ;; keyword can be used as unform function
(->> {::vtx-x 1.0 ::vtx-y 2.0}
(s/conform ::my-vertex)
(s/unform ::my-vertex))
=> {::vtx-x 1.0 ::vtx-y 2.0}
Bonus, amazingly no exception here, is this an oversight?
(conformer map?)
不,这里没有任何问题,尽管使用 map?
和 conformer
:
(s/conform (s/conformer map?) {})
=> true
(s/conform (s/conformer map?) [])
=> false
(s/conformer map?)
是一个规范,它可以接受任何值,如果它是一个映射,则符合 true,否则为 false。
where does [spec] come from initially?
合同的概念已经以各种形式出现了一段时间,例如https://docs.racket-lang.org/guide/contracts.html. Also see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Design_by_contract.