嵌套数据结构的 Rust 可变性
Rust mutability of nested data structures
谁能解释为什么下面的代码可以编译,但如果我注释掉一行,那么它就不会编译,即使代码本质上是在做同样的事情?
struct OtherStruct {
x: i32,
}
struct Inner {
blah: i32,
vector: Vec<OtherStruct>
}
struct Outer {
inner: Inner,
}
impl Inner {
pub fn set_blah(&mut self, new_val : i32) {
self.blah = new_val;
}
}
fn main() {
let mut outer = Outer {
inner: Inner {
blah: 10,
vector: vec![
OtherStruct { x: 1 },
OtherStruct { x: 2 },
OtherStruct { x: 3 },
OtherStruct { x: 4 },
OtherStruct { x: 5 },
]
}
};
for item in outer.inner.vector.iter() {
println!("{}", item.x);
outer.inner.blah = 4;
//outer.inner.set_blah(6);
}
}
编译错误为:
|
34 | for item in outer.inner.vector.iter() {
| -------------------------
| |
| immutable borrow occurs here
| immutable borrow later used here
...
37 | outer.inner.set_blah(6);
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ mutable borrow occurs here
这对我来说很有意义,我想我想知道为什么当我不使用函数调用时我可以不用它,肯定会出现相同的可变性问题吗?
set_blah
需要借用整个 Inner
结构对象。对blah
的赋值只需要借用字段本身即可,因为还没有被借用
谁能解释为什么下面的代码可以编译,但如果我注释掉一行,那么它就不会编译,即使代码本质上是在做同样的事情?
struct OtherStruct {
x: i32,
}
struct Inner {
blah: i32,
vector: Vec<OtherStruct>
}
struct Outer {
inner: Inner,
}
impl Inner {
pub fn set_blah(&mut self, new_val : i32) {
self.blah = new_val;
}
}
fn main() {
let mut outer = Outer {
inner: Inner {
blah: 10,
vector: vec![
OtherStruct { x: 1 },
OtherStruct { x: 2 },
OtherStruct { x: 3 },
OtherStruct { x: 4 },
OtherStruct { x: 5 },
]
}
};
for item in outer.inner.vector.iter() {
println!("{}", item.x);
outer.inner.blah = 4;
//outer.inner.set_blah(6);
}
}
编译错误为:
|
34 | for item in outer.inner.vector.iter() {
| -------------------------
| |
| immutable borrow occurs here
| immutable borrow later used here
...
37 | outer.inner.set_blah(6);
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ mutable borrow occurs here
这对我来说很有意义,我想我想知道为什么当我不使用函数调用时我可以不用它,肯定会出现相同的可变性问题吗?
set_blah
需要借用整个 Inner
结构对象。对blah
的赋值只需要借用字段本身即可,因为还没有被借用