如何在创建特定数量的 tasks\Threads 后等待特定的时间?

How to wait for a specific amount of time after creating a specific number of tasks\Threads?

我有一个要求,我可以在一秒钟内击中 API 5 次。如果我必须发出总共 50 个请求,我想发出前 5 个请求并等待 1 秒,然后我可以用另一批 5 个请求点击 API。我尝试使用线程池以及并行任务库 For\Foreach 循环和任务 类 但我无法获得一个顺序计数器来告诉我已经创建了 5 个任务。 这是我正在尝试做的示例:

List<string> str = new List<string>();
for (int i = 0; i <= 100; i++)
{
    str.Add(i.ToString());
}

Parallel.ForEach(str, new ParallelOptions { MaxDegreeOfParallelism = 5 },
(value, pls, index) =>
{
    Console.WriteLine(value);// simulating method call
    if (index + 1 == 5)
    {
        // need the main thread to sleep so next batch is 
        Thread.Sleep(1000);
    }
});

也许:

while(true){
   for(int i = 0; i < 5; i++)
       Task.Run(() => { <API STUFF> });
   Thread.Sleep(1000);
}

我不确定一直这样调用 task.run 是否有效。

如果已经限制为每秒 5 个,并行 运行 有多重要?这是尝试的不同视角(未经编译测试)。这个想法是限制每个,而不是限制一批。

foreach(string value in values)
{
  const int alottedMilliseconds = 200;
  Stopwatch timer = Stopwatch.StartNew();

  // ...

  timer.Stop();
  int remainingMilliseconds = alottedMilliseconds - timer.ElapsedMilliseconds;
  if(remainingMilliseconds > 0)
  {
    // replace with something more precise/thread friendly as needed.
    Thread.Sleep(remainingMilliseconds);
  }
}

或者本着你原来的要求。使用将列表分成 5 块的扩展方法扩展您的解决方案...

public static IEnumerable<List<T>> Partition<T>(this IList<T> source, Int32 size)
{
  for (int i = 0; i < Math.Ceiling(source.Count / (Double)size); i++)
  {
    yield return new List<T>(source.Skip(size * i).Take(size));
  }
}

利用此扩展在外循环中调用您的 Parallel.ForEach,然后在每个外循环结束时应用相同的计时器方法。像这样...

foreach(IEnumerable<string> batch in str.Partitition(5))
{
  Stopwatch timer = Stopwatch.StartNew();

  Parallel.ForEach(
    batch, 
    new ParallelOptions { MaxDegreeOfParallelism = 5 },
    (value, pls, index) =>
    {
      Console.WriteLine(value);// simulating method call
    });

  timer.Stop();
  int remainingMilliseconds = 5000 - timer.ElapsedMilliseconds;
  if(remainingMilliseconds > 0)
  {
    // replace with something more precise/thread friendly as needed.
    Thread.Sleep(remainingMilliseconds);
  }
}

由于您使用的是 .NET 4.0(并且希望您至少使用 VS2012),您可以使用 Microsoft.Bcl.Async 获得 async-await 功能。

一旦你这样做了,你就可以轻松地异步查询你的 API 端点(不需要额外的线程),并使用 AsyncSemaphore (见下面的实现)来限制要求你同时做。

例如:

public readonly AsyncSemaphore = new AsyncSemaphore(5);
public readonly HttpClient httpClient = new HttpClient();
public async Task<string> LimitedQueryAsync(string url)
{
    await semaphoreSlim.WaitAsync();
    try
    {
        var response = await httpClient.GetAsync(url);
        return response.Content.ReadAsStringAsync();
    }
    finally
    {
        semaphoreSlim.Release();
    }
}

现在可以这样查询了:

public async Task DoQueryStuffAsync()
{
    while (someCondition)
    {
        var results = await LimitedQueryAsync(url);

        // do stuff with results
        await Task.Delay(1000);
    }
}

编辑: 正如@ScottChamberlain 正确指出的那样,SemaphoreSlim 在 .NET 4 中不可用。您可以改用 AsyncSemaphore,如下所示:

public class AsyncSemaphore 
{ 
    private readonly static Task s_completed = Task.FromResult(true); 
    private readonly Queue<TaskCompletionSource<bool>> m_waiters = 
                                            new Queue<TaskCompletionSource<bool>>(); 
    private int m_currentCount; 

    public AsyncSemaphore(int initialCount)
    {
        if (initialCount < 0) 
        {
            throw new ArgumentOutOfRangeException("initialCount"); 
        }
        m_currentCount = initialCount; 
    }

    public Task WaitAsync() 
    { 
        lock (m_waiters) 
        { 
            if (m_currentCount > 0) 
            { 
                --m_currentCount; 
                return s_completed; 
            } 
            else 
            { 
                var waiter = new TaskCompletionSource<bool>(); 
                m_waiters.Enqueue(waiter); 
                return waiter.Task; 
            } 
        } 
    }

    public void Release() 
    { 
        TaskCompletionSource<bool> toRelease = null; 
        lock (m_waiters) 
        { 
            if (m_waiters.Count > 0) 
                toRelease = m_waiters.Dequeue(); 
            else 
                ++m_currentCount; 
        } 
        if (toRelease != null) 
            toRelease.SetResult(true); 
    }
}

下面给出了两种方法。通过这两种方式,您都将获得所需的测试配置。 不仅代码简洁,而且实现无锁


1) 递归

您必须以每批 5 个请求的形式提出 50 个请求。这意味着以 1 秒的间隔总共有 10 批次的 5 个请求。定义实体,设:

  • HitAPI() 是调用 API 一次的 线程安全 方法;
  • InitiateBatch() 是启动一批 5 个线程来命中 API,
  • 的方法

那么,示例实现可以是:

private void InitiateRecursiveHits(int batchCount)
{
    return InitiateBatch(batchCount);
}

只要用 batchCount = 10 调用上面的方法,它就会调用下面的代码..

private void InitiateBatch(int batchNumber)
{
    if (batchNumber <= 0) return;
    var hitsPerBatch = 5;
    var thisBatchHits = new Task[hitsPerBatch];
    for (int taskNumber = 1; taskNumber <= hitsPerBatch; taskNumber++)
         thisBatchHits[taskNumber - 1] = Task.Run(HitAPI);
    Task.WaitAll(thisBatchHits);
    Thread.Sleep(1000); //To wait for 1 second before starting another batch of 5
    InitiateBatch(batchNumber - 1);
    return
}

2) 迭代

这比第一种方法简单。只需以迭代方式执行递归方法...

private void InitiateIterativeHits(int batchCount)
{
    if (batchCount <= 0) return;
    // It's good programming practice to leave your input variables intact so that 
    // they hold correct value throughout the execution
    int desiredRuns = batchCount;
    var hitsPerBatch = 5;
    while (desiredRuns-- > 0)
    {
        var thisBatchHits = new Task[hitsPerBatch];
        for (int taskNumber = 1; taskNumber <= hitsPerBatch; taskNumber++)
            thisBatchHits[taskNumber - 1] = Task.Run(HitAPI);
        Task.WaitAll(thisBatchHits);
        Thread.Sleep(1000); //To wait for 1 second before starting another batch of 5
    }
}

我会为此使用 Microsoft 的 Reactive Framework (NuGet "Rx-Main")。

这是它的样子:

var query =
    Observable
        .Range(0, 100)
        .Buffer(5)
        .Zip(Observable.Interval(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(1.0)), (ns, i) => ns)
        .SelectMany(ns =>
            ns
                .ToObservable()
                .SelectMany(n =>
                    Observable
                        .Start(() =>
                        {
                            /* call here */
                            Console.WriteLine(n);
                            return n;
                        })));

然后您将像这样处理结果:

var subscription =
    query
        .Subscribe(x =>
        {
            /* handle result here */
        });

如果您需要在请求自然完成之前停止请求,您只需调用 subscription.Dispose();

漂亮、干净、明确。